Yonghun Kim·Goontaek Lee*·Hanjeon Jang·Yunju Jo·Moongun Kim·Jaeho Choi·Jiyoung Kang
NICEM, College of Agriculture and Life Science, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Korea
김용훈·이군택*·장한전·조윤주·김문건·최재호·강지영
서울대학교 농업생명과학대학 농생명과학공동기기원
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Accurate analysis of petroleum hydrocarbons in soil is an important prerequisite for proper source tracking of contamination. Identification of petroleum compounds is commonly carried out by peak pattern matching in gas chromatography. However, this method has several technical limitations, especially when the soils underwent biological, physical and chemical transformation. For instance, it is very difficult to distinguish jet fuel (JP-8) from kerosene because JP-8 is derivatized from secondary reaction between chemical agents (e.g. anti-oxidants, antifreezer and so on) and kerosene. In this study, an alternative method to separately analyze JP-8 and kerosene in the petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated soil was proposed. Qualitative analyses were performed for representative phenolic antioxidants [2,6-di-tert-butyl phenol (2,6-DTBP), 2,4-di-tert- butylphenol(2,4-DTBP), 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methyl phenol (2,6-DTBMP)] using a two dimensional gas chromatograph mass spectrometer (2D GC×GC-TOF-MS). This qualitative analysis of antioxidants in soil would be a useful complementary tool for the peak pattern matching method to identify JP-8 contamination in soil.
Keywords: Soil, Antioxidants, JP-8, Lubricants oil, Kerosene, Environmental forensic
2022; 27(4): 37-48
Published on Aug 31, 2022
NICEM, College of Agriculture and Life Science, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Korea