• Removal of Semi-volatile Soil Organic Contaminants with Microwave and Additives
  • Jeong, Sangjo;Choi, Hyungjin;
  • Department of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Korea Military Academy;Department of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Korea Military Academy;
  • 극초단파(마이크로파)와 첨가제를 이용한 오염토양 내 준휘발성 유기오염물질 제거
  • 정상조;최형진;
  • 육군사관학교 건설환경학과;육군사관학교 건설환경학과;
Abstract
To improve the energy efficiency of conventional thermal treatment, soil remediation with microwave has been studied. In this study, the remediation efficiency of contaminated soil with semi-volatile organic contaminants were evaluated with microwave oven and several additives such as water, formic acid, iron powder, sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution, and activated carbon. For the experiment, loamy sand and sandy loam collected from Imjin river flood plain were intentionally contaminated with hexachlorobenzene and phenanthrene, respectively. The contaminated soils were treated with microwave facility and the mass removals of organic contaminants from soils were evaluated. Among additives that were added to increase the remediation efficiency, activated carbon and NaOH solution were more effective than water, iron powder, and formic acid. When 10 g of hexachlorobenzene (142.4 mg/kg-soil) or phenanthrene (2,138.8 mg/kg-soil) contaminated soil that mixed with 0.5 g iron powder, 0.5 g activated carbon and 1 ml 6.25 M NaOH solution were treated with microwave for 3 minutes, more than 95% of contaminants were removed. The degradation of hexachlorobenzene during microwave treatments with additives was confirmed by the detection of pentachlorobenzene and tetrachlorobenzene. Naphthalene and phenol were also detected as degradation products of phenanthrene during microwave treatment with additives. The results showed that adding a suitable amount of additives for microwave treatments fairly increased the efficiency of removing semi-volatile soil organic contaminants.

Keywords: Microwave;Semi-volatile organic contaminants;Soil;Remediation;Thermal treatment;

This Article

  • 2013; 18(1): 67-77

    Published on Feb 28, 2013

  • 10.7857/JSGE.2013.18.1.067
  • Received on Nov 13, 2012
  • Revised on Jan 17, 2013
  • Accepted on Jan 17, 2013

Correspondence to

  • E-mail: