• Policy Suggestions to Korea from a Comparison Study of the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, the Netherlands, and Denmark's Polices on Risk Assessment of Contaminated Soils
  • Park Yong-Ha;Yang Jay-E.;Ok Yong-Sik;
  • Korea Environment Institute;Kangwon National University;Kangwon National University;
  • 토양오염 지역의 위해성 평가에 관한 외국 정책의 비교분석 및 우리나라의 정책 개선에 관한 고찰
  • 박용하;양재의;옥용식;
  • 한국환경정책.평가연구원;강원대학교 생물환경학부;강원대학교 생물환경학부;
References
  • 1. 박용하, 김미정, 정승우, 이양희, 김민정, 조장은, 2003a, 토지 이용 용도별 토양오염기준 및 복원기준 마련 연구, 환경부, p. 210-287
  •  
  • 2. 박용하, 윤서성, 방상원, 김미정, 양재의, 이양희, 2002, 토양오염지역의 관리 및 복원방안 연구 I, 한국환경정책.평가연구원, p. 72-79
  •  
  • 3. 박용하, 윤서성, 송재우, 장지수, 이양희, 2003b, 토양오염지역의 관리 및 복원방안 연구 II, 한국환경정책.평가연구원, p. 18-141
  •  
  • 4. 한국지하수토양환경학회, 2003, 토양오염 위해성 평가방안, 한국지하수토양환경학회
  •  
  • 5. 한국토양환경학회, 1998, 효율적인 토양오염조사체계 구축방안 연구, 한국토양환경학회
  •  
  • 6. Bieber, A., Franzius, V., and Freier, K., 1999, In: Ferguson, C. and Kasamas, H. (ed.), Risk assessment for contaminated sites in Europe, Volume 2 Policy Frameworks, LQM Press, Nottingham, U. K., p. 61-76
  •  
  • 7. Dennemann, C.A.J., 1997, Risk assessment in soil policy in the Netherlands, Ministry of Housing, Spatial planning and environment, The Hague, The Netherlands. Proceedings of the 3rd CARACAS meeting, Vienna, Austria
  •  
  • 8. Frank, A.S., 1999, Risk-based assessment of soil and groundwater quality in the Netherlands: standards and remediation urgency, Risk Analysis, 19(6), 1235-1249
  •  
  • 9. Herbert, S., 1999, United Kingdom, In: Ferguson, C. and Kasamas, H. (ed.), Risk assessment for contaminated sites in Europe, Volume 2 Policy Frameworks, LQM Press, Nottingham, U. K., p.165-176
  •  
  • 10. Jensen, B.K., 2001, Management of contaminated sites in Denmark, Proceeding of the Brownfields 2001 1st Int. Conf. on Contaminated Land, DHI ref. 36/01, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  •  
  • 11. Kibblewhite, M., 2001, Identifying and Dealing with Contaminated Land, In: Hester, R. E. and Harrison, R. M. (ed.), Issues in Environmental Science and Technology: No. 16 Assessment and reclamation of contaminated land, The Royal Society of Chemistry Press, London, U. K., p. 45-64
  •  
  • 12. Lowe, M. and Lowe, J., 2001, The New UK contaminated land regime, In: Hester, R. E. and Harrison, R. M. (ed.), Issues in Environmental Science and Technology: No. 16 Assessment and reclamation of contaminated land, The Royal Society of Chemistry Press, London, U. K., p. 21-44
  •  
  • 13. Prokop, G., Schamann, M., and Edelgaard, E., 2002, Management of contaminated sites in Western Europe, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark
  •  
  • 14. Quint, M., 2001, Ecological risk assessment under the new contaminated land regime, In: Hester, R. E. and Harrison, R. M. (ed.), Issues in Environmental Science and Technology: No. 16 Assessment and reclamation of contaminated land, The Royal Society of Chemistry Press, London, U. K., p. 103-114
  •  
  • 15. U. K. Department of Environment, 2000, Transport, and regions, circular 2/2000 Annex 2 statutory guidance Chapter B, London, U. K
  •  
  • 16. USEPA, 1999, Risk assessment guidance for superfund, Washington D.C., USA
  •  

This Article

  • 2005; 10(5): 1-10

    Published on Oct 1, 2005

Correspondence to

  • E-mail: