• Enhanced Transport and Risk of a Highly Nonpolar Pollutant in the Presence of LNAPL in Soil-groundwater System: In Case of p-xylene and benz[a]anthracene
  • Ryu, Hye-Rim;Han, Joon-Kyoung;Kim, Young-Jin;Nam, Kyoung-Phile;
  • Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University;Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University;Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University;Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University;
  • LNAPL에 의한 소수성 유기오염물질의 지하환경 내 이동성 변화가 위해성 증가에 미치는 영향: p-xylene과 benz[a]anthracene의 경우
  • 류혜림;한준경;김영진;남경필;
  • 서울대학교 공과대학 건설환경공학부;서울대학교 공과대학 건설환경공학부;서울대학교 공과대학 건설환경공학부;서울대학교 공과대학 건설환경공학부;
References
  • 1. 기상청 기후자료팀, 2001, 평년값 자료: 1971-2000년 서울지역 년평년값 강수량 자료, 서울, 대한민국
  •  
  • 2. 한준경, 2007, LNAPL에 의한 benz[a]anthracene의 상변화가 benz[a]anthracene의 위해도에 미치는 영향. 서울대학교 대학원 지구환경시스템공학부 석사학위 논문
  •  
  • 3. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, 1995, Toxicological Profile for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons, US Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA, USA., p. 209-221
  •  
  • 4. ATSDR, see Agency for Toxic substances and Disease Registry
  •  
  • 5. Brown, D.G., Knightes, C.D., and Peters, C.A., 1999, Risk assessment for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon NAPLs using component fractions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 33(24), 4357-4363
  •  
  • 6. Hertzberg, R.C. and MacDonell, M.M., 2002, Synergy and other ineffective mixture risk definitions, Sci. Total Environ., 288, 31-42
  •  
  • 7. IARC, see International Agency for Research on Cancer.
  •  
  • 8. International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1998a, IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Volume 3. Certain Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Heterocyclic Compounds-Summary of Data Reported and Evaluation, World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
  •  
  • 9. International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1998b, IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Volume 32. Polynuclear Aromatic Compounds, Part 1, Chemical, Environmental and Experimental Data-Summary of Data Reported and Evaluation, World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
  •  
  • 10. Jafvert, C.T., Lane, D., Lee, L.S., and Rao, P.S.C., 2006 Partitioning of mono- and poly-cyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in a river sediment adjacent to a former manufactured gas plant site, Chemosphere, 62(2), 315-321
  •  
  • 11. Knauss, K.G. and Copenhaver, S.A., 1995, The solubility of pxylene in water as a function of temperature and pressure and calculated thermodynamic quantities, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 59(12), 2443-2448
  •  
  • 12. Potter, T.L. and Simmons, K.E., 1998, Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon Criteria Working Group Series Volume 2: Composition of Petroleum Mixtures, Amherst Scientific Publishers, MA, USA
  •  
  • 13. Ramaswami, A. and Luthy, R.G., 1997, Mass transfer and bioavailability of PAH compounds in coal tar NAPL-slurry systems .1. Model development, Environ. Sci. Technol., 31(8), 2260-2267
  •  
  • 14. Russold, S., Schirmer, M., and Piepenbrink, M., 2006, Modeling the impact of a benzene source zone on the transport behavior of PAHs in groundwater, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40(11), 3565-3571
  •  
  • 15. Teuschler, L.K., 2006, Deciding which chemical mixtures risk assessment methods work best for what mixtures, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., in press, Online ver. available, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/0041008X.
  •  
  • 16. US Environmental Protection Agency, 1991, Role of the Baseline Risk Assessment in Superfund Remedy Selection Decisions (OSWER Directive 9355.0-30), Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington, D. C. , USA
  •  
  • 17. US Environmental Protection Agency, 2000, Supplementary Guidance for Conducting Health Risk Assessment of Chemical Mixtures, Risk Assessment Forum, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D. C., USA
  •  
  • 18. US Environmental Protection Agency, 2003, Framework for Cumulative Risk Assessment, Risk Assessment Forum, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D. C., USA
  •  
  • 19. US Environmental Protection Agency, 2007, Updated Monthly, Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS), Environmental Protection Agency, National Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, OH, USA
  •  
  • 20. US EPA, see US Environmental Protection Agency
  •  

This Article

  • 2007; 12(4): 25-31

    Published on Aug 31, 2007

Correspondence to

  • E-mail: