• Human Risk Assessment of a Contaminated Site Using Korean Risk-Based Corrective Action (K-RBCA) Software
  • Nam, Taek-Woo;Ryu, Hye-Rim;Kim, Young-Jin;Ko, Seok-Oh;Baek, Ki-Tae;Nam, Kyoung-Phile;
  • Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University;Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University;Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University;Department of Civil Engineering, Kyunghee University;Department of Environmental Engineering, Kumoh National Institute of Technoology;Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University;
  • 한국형 소프트웨어를 이용한 유류.중금속 복합오염지역의 인체위해성평가 및 RBCA Tool Kit과의 비교분석
  • 남택우;류혜림;김영진;고석오;백기태;남경필;
  • 서울대학교 공과대학 건설환경공학부;서울대학교 공과대학 건설환경공학부;서울대학교 공과대학 건설환경공학부;경희대학교 공과대학 토목공학과;금오공과대학교 토목환경공학부;서울대학교 공과대학 건설환경공학부;
References
  • 1. ASTM, 1995, Standard Guide for Risk-Based Corrective Action Applied at Petroleum Release Sites (E 1739-95), American Society for Testing Materials, PA, USA.
  •  
  • 2. ASTM, 2004, Standard Guide for Risk-Based Corrective Action (E 2081-00), American Society for Testing Materials, PA, USA.
  •  
  • 3. Connor, J.A., Bowers, R.L., Nevin, J.P., and Fisher, T., 2000, Software Guidance Manual for RBCA Tool Kit for Chemical Releases, Groundwater Services, INC., TA, p. A-12.
  •  
  • 4. DEFRA and EA, 2002, The Contaminated Land Exposure Assessment Model (CLEA): Technical Basis and Algorithms, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs & Environment Agency, UK.
  •  
  • 5. Khan, F.I. and Husain, T., 2001, Risk-Based Monitored Natural Attenuation-A Case Study, J. Hazard. Mater., B85, 243-272.
  •  
  • 6. MacDonald, J.A., 2000, Evaluating Natural Attenuation for Groundwater Cleanup, Environ. Sci. Technol., 34, 346A-353A.
  •  
  • 7. McGraph, D., Zhang, C.S., and Carton, O., 2004, Geostatistical Analyses and Harzard Assessment on Soil Lead in Silvermines, Area Ireland, Environ. Pollut., 127, 239-248.
  •  
  • 8. RIVM, 2001, Technical evaluation of the Intervention Values for Soil/sediment and Groundwater (report 711701 023), Research for Man and Environment, Netherlands.
  •  
  • 9. TPHCWG, 1999, Human Health Risk-Based Evaluation of Petroleum Release Sites: Implementing the Working Group Approach, Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon Criteria Working Group Series, Amherst Scientific Publishers, MA, p. 60.
  •  
  • 10. US EPA, updated monthly, Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS), Environmental Protection Agency, National Center for Environment, USA.
  •  
  • 11. US EPA, 1991a, Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund, Vol. I, Human Health Evaluation Manual Supplemental Guidance: Standard Default Exposure Factors (OSWER Directive 9285.6-03), Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Washington, D.C., USA.
  •  
  • 12. US EPA, 1991b, Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund, Vol. I, Human Health Evaluation Manual, Part B (EPA/540/R-92/003), Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Washington, D.C., USA.
  •  
  • 13. US EPA, 1992, Dermal Exposure Assessment: Principles and Applications (EPA/600/8-91/011B), Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Office of Health and Environmental Assessment, Exposure Assessment Group, Washington, D.C., USA.
  •  
  • 14. US EPA, 1996, Soil Screening Guidance: User's Guide (EPA/540/R-96/018), Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington, D.C., USA.
  •  
  • 15. US EPA, 1997, Exposure Factors Handbook (EPA/600/P-95/002F), Office of Research and Development, Washington, D.C., USA.
  •  
  • 16. US EPA, 2009b, Regional Screening Levels (RSL) for Chemical Contaminants at Superfund Sites, RSL Table Update, Environmental Protection Agency, National Center for Environment, USA.
  •  

This Article

Correspondence to

  • E-mail: