• Comparative study of Ecological Risk Assessment : Deriving Soil Ecological Criteria
  • Lee, Woo-Mi;Kim, Shin Woong;Jeong, Seung-Woo;An, Youn-Joo;
  • Department of Environmental Science, Konkuk University;Department of Environmental Science, Konkuk University;Department of Environmental Engineering, Kunsan National University;Department of Environmental Science, Konkuk University;
  • 토양생태계 위해성평가기법 비교연구: 토양생태준거치 산정을 중심으로
  • 이우미;김신웅;정승우;안윤주;
  • 건국대학교 환경과학과;건국대학교 환경과학과;군산대학교 환경공학과;건국대학교 환경과학과;
References
  • 1. An, Y.-J., Lee, W.-M., Nam, S.-H., and Jeong, S.-W., 2010, Proposed approach of Korean ecological risk assessment for the derivation of soil quality criteria, J. Soil & Groundwater Env., 15(3), 7-14.
  •  
  • 2. CCME (Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment), 2006, A Protocol for the Derivation of Environmental and Human Health Soil Quality Guideline.
  •  
  • 3. EA (Environment Agency), 2008a, An ecological risk assessment framework for contaminants in soil.
  •  
  • 4. EA (Environment Agency), 2008b, Guidance on the use of soil screening values in ecological risk assessment.
  •  
  • 5. ECB (European Chemical Bureau), 2003, Technical guidance document on risk assessment.
  •  
  • 6. ECB (European Chemical Bureau), 2012, European Union Risk Assessment Report: Nickel and nickel compounds.
  •  
  • 7. MOE (Ministry of Environment), 2005, Road map of a master plan for soil preservation.
  •  
  • 8. MOE/NIER (Ministry of Environment/National Institute of Environmental Research), 2006, Development of integrated methodology for evaluation of water environment (III)-Establishment of risk assessment systems for human and aquatic ecosystem.
  •  
  • 9. MOE (Ministry of Environment), 2007, Risk assessment of lead, mercury, and cadmium and risk management plan.
  •  
  • 10. MOE (Ministry of Environment), 2009, Master plan for soil preservation.
  •  
  • 11. NEPC (National Environment Protection Council), 2011a, Assessment of site contamination-Schedule B5a: Guideline on ecological risk assessment.
  •  
  • 12. NEPC (National Environment Protection Council), 2011b, Assessment site contamination-Schedule B5b: methodology to derive ecological investigation levels in contaminated soil.
  •  
  • 13. NIER (National Institute of Environmental Research), 2005a, Risk assessment of lead, cadmium, and mercury.
  •  
  • 14. NIER (National Institute of Environmental Research), 2005b, Study on the methodology for evaluation of potential hazardous pollutants (II).
  •  
  • 15. NIER (National Institute of Environmental Research), 2005c, Study on the methodology for evaluation of potential hazardous pollutants (III).
  •  
  • 16. RIVM (National Institute for Public Health and the Environment), 1994, Guidance document on the derivation of ecotoxicological criteria for serious soil contamination in view of the intervention value for soil clean-up.
  •  
  • 17. RIVM, 1995, Derivation of the ecological serious soil contamination concentration.
  •  
  • 18. RIVM, 2001a, Guidance document on deriving environmental risk limits.
  •  
  • 19. RIVM, 2001b, Technical evaluation of intervention values for soil/sediment and groundwater.
  •  
  • 20. RIVM, 2001c, Ecotoxicological serious risk concentrations for soil, sediment, and (ground) water: updated proposals for first series of compounds.
  •  
  • 21. RIVM, 2007, Guidance for the derivation of environmental risk limits within the framework of 'International and national environmental quality standards for substances in the Netherlands' (INS).
  •  
  • 22. US EPA, 2005, Guidance for developing ecological soil screening levels.
  •  

This Article

  • 2012; 17(5): 1-9

    Published on Oct 31, 2012

  • 10.7857/JSGE.2012.17.5.001
  • Received on Jun 20, 2012
  • Revised on Oct 16, 2012
  • Accepted on Oct 17, 2012

Correspondence to

  • E-mail: