• A Comparative Study of Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Methods: Application in Gumma, Korea
  • Ki, Min-Gyu;Yoon, Heesung;Koh, Dong-Chan;Hamm, Se-Yeong;Lee, Chung-Mo;Kim, Hyun-Su;
  • Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources;Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources;Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources;Division of Earth Environmental System, Pusan National University;Division of Earth Environmental System, Pusan National University;Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Chonbuk National University;
  • 지하수 오염 취약성 기법의 비교 적용 연구: 충남 홍성군 금마면 일대에의 적용
  • 기민규;윤희성;고동찬;함세영;이충모;김현수;
  • 한국지질자원연구원;한국지질자원연구원;한국지질자원연구원;부산대학교 지질환경과학과;부산대학교 지질환경과학과;전북대학교 지구환경과학과;
References
  • 1. Aller, L., Bennet, T., Lehr, J.H., Petty, R.J., and Hacket, G., 1987, DRASTIC: a standardised system for evaluating ground water pollution potential using hydrogeologic settings, USEPA, 455 p.
  •  
  • 2. Cheong, B.K., Chae, G.T., Koh, D.C., Ko, K.S., and Koo, M.H., 2008, A study of improvement for the prediction of groundwater pollution in rural area: application in keumsan, Korea, J. Soil &Groundwater Env., 13(4), 40-53.
  •  
  • 3. Civita, M., 1994, Le carte della vulnerabilita' degli acquiferi all'inquinamento: Teoria &pratica, Pitagora Editrice, Bologna, 325 p.
  •  
  • 4. Civita, M., and De Maio, M., 2004, Assessing and mappinggroundwater vulnerability to contamination: The Italian ''combined''approach, Geof' sica International, 43(4), 513-532.
  •  
  • 5. Daly, D., Dassargues, A., Drew, D., Dunne, S., Goldscheider, N., Neale, S., Popescu, I.C., and Zwahlen, F., 2002, Main concepts of the "European approach" to karst-groundwater-vulnerability assessment and mapping, Hydrogeol. J., 10(2), 340-345.
  •  
  • 6. Doerfliger, N. and Zwahlen, F., 1997, EPIK: a new method for outlining of protection areas in karstic environment. In: Gunay G, Jonshon AI (eds) International Symposium and Field Seminar on "Karst Waters and Environmental Impacts", Antalya, Turkey, Balkema, Rotterdam, p. 117-123.
  •  
  • 7. Foster, S.S.D., 1987, Fundamental concepts in aquifer vulnerability, pollution risk and protection strategy, van Duijvenbooden, W., van Waegeningh, H.G.(eds.), Vulnerability of Soils and Groundwater to Pollution, TNO Committee on Hydrological Research, The Hague. 38, p. 69-86.
  •  
  • 8. Freeze, R.A. and Cherry, J.A., 1979, Groundwater, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 604 p.
  •  
  • 9. Gogu, R.C. and Dassargues, A., 2000, Current trends and future challenges in groundwater vulnerability assessment using overlay and index methods, Environ. Geol., 39(6), 549-559.
  •  
  • 10. Goldscheider, N., 2005, Karst groundwater vulnerability mapping: application of a new method in the Swabian Alb, Germany, Hydrogeol. J., 13(4), 555-564.
  •  
  • 11. Ham, S.Y., Cheong, J.Y., Kim, M.J., Kim, I.S., and Hwang, H.S., 2004, Assessing groundwater vulnerability using DRASTIC method and groundwater quality in Changwon City, Econ. Environ. Geol., 37(6), 631-645.
  •  
  • 12. Han, J.S., Han, K.S, Lee, Y.D., and Yoo, D.H., 1990, An assessment of groundwater pollution potential of a proposed petrochemical plant site in Ulsan, South Korea, J. Korean Inst. Mining Geol., 23(4), 425-452.
  •  
  • 13. Jo, S.B., Min, K.D., Woo, N.C., and Lee S.R., 1999, A study on groundwater contamination potential of Pyungtaek-Gun area, Kyunggi-Do Using GIS, J. Korean Soc. Groundwater Environ., 6(2), 87-94.
  •  
  • 14. Jo, S.B. and Shon, H.W., 2004, A study on the prediction of groundwater contamination using GIS, J. Korean Geophysical Soc., 7(2), 121-134.
  •  
  • 15. Kang, J.H. and Park, E., 2010, A comparative application of DRASTIC and SINTACS models for the assessment of groundwater vulnerability of Buyeo Area, J. Soil &Groundwater Env., 15(5), 32-39.
  •  
  • 16. Ki, M.G., 2013, Characterization of nitrate contamination and vulnerability assessment of groundwater in an agricultural area (northeastern Hongseong), Unpublished MS thesis, Chonbuk National University, 114 p.
  •  
  • 17. Kim, G.B., 2008, Consideration of trends and applications of groundwater vulnerability assessment methods in South Korea, J. Soil &Groundwater Env., 13(6), 1-16.
  •  
  • 18. Kurzynski, M., Woloszynski, T., and Lysiak, R., 2010, On two measures of classifier competence for dynamic ensemble selection - Experimental comparative analysis, ISCIT 2010 -2010 10th International Symposium on Communications and Information Technologies, Japan, p.1108-1113.
  •  
  • 19. Lee, H.J., Park, E., Kim, K.J., and Park, K.H., 2008, A joint application of DRASTIC and numerical groundwater flow model for the assessment of groundwater vulnerability of Buyeo-Eup Area, J. Soil &Groundwater Env., 13(1), 77-91.
  •  
  • 20. Lee, S.R. and Choi, S.H., 1997, Groundwater pollution susceptibility assessment of Younggwang area using GIS technique, J. Soil &Groundwater Env., 4(4), 223-230.
  •  
  • 21. Ministry of Land, Transportation and Maritime Affairs (MLTM), K-Water, Korea Rural Community Corporation, 2005, Report on groundwater basic survey of Kimhae area.
  •  
  • 22. Ministry of Land, Transportation and Maritime Affairs (MLTM), 2012, National Groundwater Monitoring Network in Korea Annual Report 2012, 691 p.
  •  
  • 23. Muhammetoglu, H., Muhammetoglu, A., and Soyupak, S., 2003, Assessment of nitrogen excess in an agricultural area using a nitrogen balance approach, Proceedings of the 7th International Specialised IWA Conference, Bruen, M. (editor), Dublin, Ireland, p.727-732.
  •  
  • 24. Nolan, B.T., 2001, Relating nitrogen sources and aquifer susceptibility ot nitrate in shallow ground waters of the United States, Ground Water, 39(2), 290-299.
  •  
  • 25. Nolan, B.T., Hitt, K.J., and Ruddy, B.C., 2002, Probability of nitrate contamination of recently recharged groundwaters in the conterminous United States, Environ. Sci. Technol., 32(10), 2138-2145.
  •  
  • 26. National Research Council, 1993, Ground Water Vulnerability Assessment: Predictive Relative Contamination Potential under Conditions of Uncertainty. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 224 p.
  •  
  • 27. Panagopoulos, G.P., Antonakos, A.K., and Lambrakis, N.J., 2006, Optimization of the DRASTIC method for groundwater vulnerability assessment via the use of simple statistical methods and GIS, Hydrogeol. J., 14, 894-911.
  •  
  • 28. Park, C.K., 1996, Estimation of the available amount of groundwater in South Korea: 2. Application of five major river basins, J. Soil &Groundwater Env., 3(1), 21-26.
  •  
  • 29. Ritter, A., Munoz-Carpena, R., Bosch, D.D., Schaffer, B., and Potter, T.L., 2007, Agriculrural land use and hydrology affect variability of shallow groundwater nitrate concentration in South Florida, Hydrol. Processes, 21, 2464-2473.
  •  
  • 30. Rupert, M.G., 1999, Improvements to the DRASTIC Ground-Water Vulnerability Mapping Method, USGS, USGS Fact Sheet, FS-066-99.
  •  
  • 31. Thornthwaite, C.W., 1944, Report of the committee on transpiration and evaporation, Transactions, American Geophysical Union, 25, 687 p.
  •  
  • 32. Thornthwaite, C.W. and Mather, J.R., 1957, Instruction and tables for computing potential evapotranspiration and the water balance, 5th printing, v.10, CW Thornthwaite Associates, Laboratory of Climatology, Elmer, NJ, USA.
  •  
  • 33. Van Stempvoort, D., Evert, L., and Wassenaar, L., 1995. AVI: A method for Groundwater Protection mapping in the Praire Province of Canada. PPWB Report No. 114, National Hydrogeology Research Institute, Saskatoon Saskatchewan, Canada.
  •  
  • 34. Vrba, J. and Zaporozec, A., 1994, Guidebook on Mapping Groundwater Vulnerability: IAH International Contribution to Hydrogeology, Verlag Heinz Heise GmbH &Co KG, 16, 131p.
  •  
  • 35. Woo, N., 1994, Introduction to DRASTIC: a method for groundwater vulnerability assessment, Econ. Environ. Geol., 27(6), 611-612.
  •  
  • 36. Yue, Y., Li, X., and Zong, Q., 2011, Development of automobile fault diagnosis expert system based on fault tree neural network ensamble, 2011 International Conference on Electronics, Communications and Control(ICECC) Proceedings, China, p. 2028-2031.
  •  

This Article

  • 2013; 18(3): 119-133

    Published on Jun 30, 2013

  • 10.7857/JSGE.2013.18.3.119
  • Received on May 30, 2013
  • Revised on Jun 24, 2013
  • Accepted on Jun 24, 2013

Correspondence to

  • E-mail: