• Determination of Human Health Risk Incorporated with Arsenic Bioaccessibility and Remediation Goals at the Former Janghang Smelter Site
  • Yang, Kyung;Kim, Young-Jin;Im, Jinwoo;Nam, Kyoungphile;
  • Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University;Water/Environment Team, Civil Engineering Division, Samsung C&T Corporation;Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University;Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University;
  • (구)장항제련소 매입구역의 비소 오염도와 생물학적접근성을 반영한 위해성평가 및 정화수준 결정에 관한 연구
  • 양경;김영진;임진우;남경필;
  • 서울대학교 건설환경공학부;삼성물산주식회사 Civil 엔지니어링본부 물/환경팀;서울대학교 건설환경공학부;서울대학교 건설환경공학부;
References
  • 1. Adriano, D.C., 2001, Trace Elements in the Terrestrial Environment, 2nd ed, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, USA, 255 p.
  •  
  • 2. ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances & Disease Registry), 2014, Priority List of Hazardous Substances, available at http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/spl/.
  •  
  • 3. Basta, N.T., Foster, J.N., Dayton, E.A., Rodriguez, R.R., and Casteel, S.W., 2007, The effect of dosing vehicle on arsenic bioaccessibility in smelter-contaminated soils, J. Environ. Sci. Health, Part A, 42(9), 1275-1281.
  •  
  • 4. Bradham, K.D., Scheckel, K.G., Nelson, C.M., Seales, P.E., Lee, G.E., Hughes, M.F., Miller, B.W., Yeow, A., Gilmore, T., Serda, S.M., Harper, S., and Thomas, D.J., 2011, Relative bioavailability and bioaccessibility and speciation of arsenic in contaminated soils, Environ. Health Perspect., 119(11), 1629-1634.
  •  
  • 5. Brattin, W., Drexler, J., Lowney, Y., Griffin, S., Diamond, G., and Woodbury, L., 2013, An in vitro method for estimation of arsenic relative bioavailability in soil, J. Toxicol. Environ. Health, Part A, 76(7), 458-478.
  •  
  • 6. Dermont, G., Bergeron, M., Mercier, G., and Richer-Laflche, M., 2008, Soil washing for metal removal: A review of physical/chemical technologies and field applications, J. Hazard. Mater., 152(1), 1-31.
  •  
  • 7. Juhasz, A.L., Weber, J., Smith, E., Naidu, R., Rees, M., Rofe, A., Kuchel, T., and Sansom, L., 2009, Assessment of four commonly employed in vitro arsenic bioaccessibility assays for predicting in vivo relative arsenic bioavailability in contaminated Soils, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43(24), 9487-9494.
  •  
  • 8. KECO (Korea Environment Corporation), 2008, Detailed Soil Servey Report for Former Janahang Smelter Area.
  •  
  • 9. Kelley, M.E., Brauning, S., Schoof, R., and Ruby, M., 2002, Assessing Oral Bioavailability of Metals in Soil, Battelle Press, Columbus, OH, USA, 75-85 p.
  •  
  • 10. KMOE (Korea Ministry of Environment), 2009, Official Test Methods of Soil Quality, 2009-255.
  •  
  • 11. KMOE, 2010, Detailed Soil Survey Guidance, 2010-104.
  •  
  • 12. KMOE, 2011, Soil Contaminant Risk Assessment Guidance, 2011-139.
  •  
  • 13. Rodriguez, R.R., Basta, N.T., Casteel, S.W., and Pace, L.W., 1999, An in vitro gastrointestinal method to estimate bioavailable arsenic in contaminated soils and solid media, Environ. Sci. Technol., 33(4), 642-649.
  •  
  • 14. Ruby, M.V., Davis, A., Schoof, R., Eberle, S., and Sellstone, C.M., 1996, Estimation of lead and arsenic bioavailability using a Physiologically Based Extraction Test, Environ. Sci. Technol., 30(2), 422-430.
  •  
  • 15. USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency), 1989, Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS), Volume I: Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part A), Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Washington, DC, USA, EPA/540/1-89/002.
  •  
  • 16. USEPA, 1992, Guidelines for Exposure Assessment, Risk Assessment Forum, Washington, DC, USA, EPA/600/Z-92/001.
  •  
  • 17. USEPA, 2004, Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS), Volume I: Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part E, Supplemental Guidance for Dermal Risk Assessment), Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation, Washington, DC, USA, EPA/540/R/99/005.
  •  
  • 18. USEPA, 2007, Guidance for Evaluating the Oral Bioavailability of Metals in Soils for Use in Human Health Risk Assessment, Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation, Washington, DC, USA, OSWER 9285.7-80.
  •  
  • 19. USEPA, 2011, ProUCL 4.1 software, available at http://www.epa.gov/osp/hstl/tsc/software.htm.
  •  
  • 20. USEPA, 2012a, Compilation and Review of Data on Relative Bioavailability of Arsenic in Soil, Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation, Washington, DC, USA, OSWER 9200.1-113.
  •  
  • 21. USEPA, 2012b, Recommendations for Default Value for Relative Bioavailability of Arsenic in Soil, Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation, Washington, DC, USA, OSWER 9200.1-113.
  •  
  • 22. USEPA, 2014, Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS), available at http://www.epa.gov/iris/.
  •  
  • 23. USEPA Region 8, 2012, Standard Operating Procedure, In Vitro Bioacessibility (IVBA) Procedure for Arsenic.
  •  
  • 24. WHO (World Health Organization), 2014, Agents Classified by the IARC Monographs, available at http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/.
  •  

This Article

  • 2014; 19(4): 52-61

    Published on Aug 31, 2014

  • 10.7857/JSGE.2014.19.4.052
  • Received on Apr 15, 2014
  • Revised on Jun 27, 2014
  • Accepted on Jun 30, 2014

Correspondence to

  • E-mail: