• Future Direction on Policy and Technology Development for the Risk-based Contaminated Site Management
  • Cho, Myung-Hyun;Kim, Do-Hyung;Baek, Kitae;
  • Department of Environmental Engineering and Soil Environment Research Center, Chonbuk National University;Korea Environmental Industry & Technology Institute;Department of Environmental Engineering and Soil Environment Research Center, Chonbuk National University;
  • 위해성 기반 오염부지관리를 위한 정책 및 기술개발 방향
  • 조명현;김도형;백기태;
  • 전북대학교 환경공학과 및 토양환경연구센터;한국환경산업기술원;전북대학교 환경공학과 및 토양환경연구센터;
References
  • 1. Asensio, V., Rodriguez, A., Gamendia, L., Andre, J., Kille, P., Morgan, A.J., Soto, M., and Marigomez, I., 2013, Towards an intergrative soil health assessment strategy : A three tier (intergrative biomarker response) approach with Eisenia fetida applied to soils subjected to chronic metal pollution, Sci. Total. Environ., 442, 344-365.
  •  
  • 2. Chae, Y.E., Kim, S.W., Kwak, J.I., Yoon, Y.D., Jeong, S.W., and An, Y.J., 2015, A comparative study of assessment techniques for soil ecosystem health: Focusing on assessment factors of soil health, J. Soil Groundw. Environ., 20(3), 15-24.
  •  
  • 3. Chinese Ministry of Environmental Protection, http://www.zhb.gov.cn/ [accessed 17.08.20]
  •  
  • 4. DEFRA, 2009, Soil strategy for England supporting evidence paper, UK.
  •  
  • 5. EA, 2006, The development and use of soil quality indicators for assessing the role of soil in environmental interactions, Science Report SC030265, Environmental Agency, Bristol, UK.
  •  
  • 6. Federal Ministry for the Environment, 2002, German Federal Government Soil Protection Report, Bonn, Germany.
  •  
  • 7. Japanese Ministry of the Environment, http://www.env.go.jp/water/ [accessed 17.09.01]
  •  
  • 8. Kerth, M., 2014, A Report of Management of Contaminated Land Registry and Suspicious Soil Contamination in Germany, KEI International Environmental Policy Forum for Soil and Groundwater, Sejong, Republic of Korea.
  •  
  • 9. Yoo, K.J., Yang, J.H., Kim, J.H., and Hwang, S.I., 2016, A study on present international status and implications for introduction of contaminated land register system into Korea, J. Soil Groundw. Environ., 21(4), 10-19.
  •  
  • 10. Korea Environmental Industry & Technology Institute (KEITI), 2015, Final Report: Study on the Surface Environment Management Technology Development Project.
  •  
  • 11. Korea Institute of Science & Technology Evaluation and Planning (KISTEP). 2015, 2015 Technology Evaluation.
  •  
  • 12. Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE), http://www.me.go.kr/home/web/index.do?menuId=286 [accessed 17.08.20]
  •  
  • 13. Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE), 2003a, Study on Risk Assessment Plans for Soil Contamination.
  •  
  • 14. Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE), 2003b, Study on the Development of Soil Contamination and Rehabilitation Criteria by Land Use.
  •  
  • 15. Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE), 2007a, Guideline on Remediation Methods for Contaminated Soil.
  •  
  • 16. Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE), 2007b, Study on Priority Selection of Soil Contaminants.
  •  
  • 17. Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE), 2008, Study on the Improvement of the Risk Assessment System for Soil Contamination.
  •  
  • 18. Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE), 2009, Soil Conservation Master Plan (2009-2019).
  •  
  • 19. Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE), 2012, Environmental Technology Roadmap (Eco-TRM 2022).
  •  
  • 20. Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE), 2013, Comprehensive Plan for Surface Soil Conservation (2013-2017).
  •  
  • 21. Korea Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT), 2012, Groundwater Management Master Plan (2012-2021).
  •  
  • 22. LIFE Environment, 2014, LIFE and Soil protection. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. European Union.
  •  
  • 23. Marc van Liedekerke, M., Prokop, G., Rabl-Berger, S., Kibblewhite, M., and Louwagie, G., 2014, Progress in the management of Contaminated Sites in Europe. Joint Research Centre of the European Commission. European Union.
  •  
  • 24. Ok, Y.S., Yang, J.E., and Park, Y.H., 2005, Framework on soil quality indicator selection and assessment for the sustainable soil management, J. Environ. Policy., 4(1), 69-87.
  •  
  • 25. Ok, Y.S., Lim, S., and Kim, J.G., 2002, Electrochemical properties of soils: Principles and applications, Life Sci. and Nat. Resour. Res., 10, 69-84.
  •  
  • 26. Panagos, P., Van Liedekerke, M., Yigini, Y., and Montanarella, L., 2013, Contaminated sites in Europe: Review of the current situation based on data collected through a European Network, J. Environ. Public Health., Article ID:158764.
  •  
  • 27. Park, Y.H., 2017, Policy approaches for expanding the scope of risk assessment at contaminated soil sites in South Korea, J. Environ. Policy., 25(2), 183-198.
  •  
  • 28. Park, Y.H., Yang, J.E., and Ok, Y.S., 2005, Policy Suggestions to Korea from a Comparison Study of the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, the Netherlands, and Denmarks's Policies on Risk Assessment of Contaminated Soils, J. Soil Groundw. Environ., 10(5), 1-10.
  •  
  • 29. USDA, 2013, National Soil Survey Handbook Part 622, National Resources Conservation Service Soils, United States Department of Agriculture.
  •  
  • 30. USEPA 1999, Risk assessment guidance for superfund, Washington D.C., USA.
  •  
  • 31. USEPA, http:// www.epa.gov/land-research/ research-management-contaminated-sites [accessed 17.08.20]
  •  
  • 32. USEPA, 2001, Road Map to Understanding Innovative Technology Options for Brownfields Investigation and Cleanup.
  •  
  • 33. USEPA, 2003, Using the Triad Approach to Streamline Brownfields Site Assessment and Clean-up.
  •  

This Article

Correspondence to

  • E-mail: