• Modeling Fate and Transport of Organic and Nitrogen Species in Soil Aquifer Treatment-(II) Simulations Based on the Field Conditions
  • Kim Jung-Woo;Kim Jeong-Kon;Lee Young-Joon;Choi Hee-Chul;
  • Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology;Korea Institute of Water and Environment, Korea Water Resources Corporation;National Institute of Environmental Research;Center for Water Research, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology;
  • 토양/대수층 처리(Soil Aquifer Treatment)에서 유기물과 질소화합물 제거와 이송 모델링-(II) 현장조건의 변화에 따른 모델 결과
  • 김정우;김정곤;이영준;최희철;
  • 광주과학기술원 환경공학과;한국수자원공사 수자원연구원;국립환경연구원;광주과학기술원 물 연구센터;
Abstract
For the SAT modeling system considering the reaction module which consists of nitrification, denitrification and organic oxidation, an imaginary cross-sectional 2-dimensional model simulation was carried out to analyze the sensitivity of the model. Four parameters, such as hydraulic conductivity, source water loading rate, ground surface pavement and operation schedule, were considered for the sensitivity analysis. Most factors considered in model development step were well reflected in the simulation results.

암모늄의 질산화 반응, 질소산화물의 탈질 반응, 그리고 유기물의 산화반응을 고려한 SAT 모델링 시스템에 대해서, 현장조건의 변화에 따른 모델 결과를 비교하기 위해 6가지 모델 조건에 대한 가상의 수직 2차원상 모델 시뮬레이션을 하였다. 시뮬레이션 조건에서 수리전도도, 주입수 주입율, 지표 피복 여부, 그리고 운영 계획과 같은 4가지 영향 인자들이 고려되었다. 시뮬레이션 결과, 모든 조건에서 모델 개발 과정에서 고려한 반응 영향들이 잘 모사되었다.

Keywords: Soil aquifer treatment;DOC;Nitrogen species;Modeling;Sensitivity;

Keywords: 토양/대수층 처리;유기물;질소화합물;모델링;민감도;

References
  • 1. Fox, P., Narayanaswamy, K., Genz, A., and Drewes, J.E., 2001, Water quality transformation during Soil Aquifer Treatment at the Mesa Northwest Water Reclamation Plant, USA, Water Sci. Technol., 43(10), 343-350
  •  
  • 2. Kanarek, A. and Michail, M., 1996, Groundwater recharge with municipal effluent: Dan region reclamation project, Israel, Water Sci. Technol., 34(11), 227-233
  •  
  • 3. MacQuarrie, K.T.B. and Sudicky, E.A., 2001, Multicomponent simulation of wastewater-derived nitrogen and carbon in shallow unconfined aquifers I. Model formulation and performance, J. Contam. Hydrol., 47, 53-84
  •  
  • 4. National Center for Sustainable Water Supply (NCSWS), 2001, Investigation on Soil-Aquifer Treatment for sustainable water reuse, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, U.S.A .. [Research Project Summary]
  •  
  • 5. Nema, P., Ojha, C.S.P., Kumar, A., and Khanna, P., 2001, Techno-economic evaluation of soil-aquifer treatment using primary . effluent at Ahmedabad, India, Water Res., 35(9), 2179-2190
  •  
  • 6. Tang, Z., Li, G, Mays, L.W., and Fox, P., 1996, Development of methodology for the optimal operation of soil aquifer treatment systems, Water Sci. Technol., 33(10-11), 433-442
  •  
  • 7. van Genuchten, M.Th., 1980, A Closed-form Equation for Predicting the Hydraulic Conductivity of Unsaturated Soils, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J, 44, 892-898
  •  
  • 8. van Riper, C. and Geselbracht, J., 1999, Water reclamation and reuse, Water Environ. Res., 71(5), 720-728
  •  

This Article

  • 2005; 10(4): 13-17

    Published on Aug 1, 2005