• Comparative Study on Stationary and Trolling Methods of Flowmeter in Fractured Rock Aquifer
  • Jang, Ki-Young;Park, Hak-Yun;Kim, Tae-Hee;Yeo, In-Wook;
  • Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Chonnam National University;Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Chonnam National University;Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources;Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Chonnam National University;
  • 암반대수층에서의 공내 유량측정기의 고정식 및 이동식 측정방법에 관한 비교 연구
  • 장기영;박학윤;김태희;여인욱;
  • 전남대학교 지구환경과학부;전남대학교 지구환경과학부;한국지질자원연구원;전남대학교 지구환경과학부;
Abstract
Stationary and trolling methods in measuring flow using flowmeter were adopted to investigate the hydraulic connectivity of fractures and to evaluate the applicability of the measurement methods. Stationary method was useful for identifying the inflow and outflow patterns in the measured section, which enabled us to analyze the hydraulic connectivity of fractures between the wells. Trolling method failed to find the inflow and outflow patterns in the well, but was very effective for locating the conductive fractures. Measuring flow in the borehole by both stationary and trolling methods was found to be very efficient for identifying conductive fractures and their hydraulic connectivity in fractured rock aquifer.

공내 유량측정기의 고정식 및 이동식 측정방법을 이용하여 암반대수층에서의 절리의 수리적 연결성 및 두 측정방법의 적용성을 검토하였다. 고정식 측정방법의 경우 측정구간에서의 지하수의 유출 및 유입을 파악할 수 있어, 관정사이의 수리적 연결성을 해석하는데 매우 유용하였다. 이동식 측정방법의 경우 유량측정기의 이동속도로 인해 지하수의 유출 및 유입 경향을 파악할 수 없었으나, 지하수 유출 및 유입이 일어나는 절리의 정확한 위치를 찾는데 매우 유용하였다. 두 측정방법을 동시에 사용하는 것이 지하수 유동절리의 위치 및 수리적 연결성을 파악하는데 더 효율적인 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords: flowmeter;stationary method;trolling method;conductive fracture;hydraulic connectivity;

Keywords: 공내 유량측정기;고정식측정방법;이동식측정방법;지하수 유동 절리;수리적 연결성;

References
  • 1. 김용제, 김태희, 김구영, 황세호, 채병곤, 2005, 파쇄대 응회암 대 수층의 지하수 유동 특성화 기법, 지하수토양환경 10(4), 33-44
  •  
  • 2. 김태희, 신제현, 황세호, 김구영, 조병욱, 채병곤, 김용제, 2004a, 지하수 유향-유속 자료 및 균열 분포를 이용한 균열암반 특성화 기법, 한국지하수토양환경학회 추계학술발표회, p. 155-158
  •  
  • 3. 김태희, 황세호, 채병곤, 고경석, 이철우, 김용제, 2004b, 현장균 열망 연결성 통합해 석에 대한 선행연구, 한국지하수토양환경학회 춘계 학술발표회, p. 509-513
  •  
  • 4. 한국자원연구소, 1997, 광주 지질도폭 설명서(1:250,000), KR- 97(S)-1, 과학기술부
  •  
  • 5. 한국지질자원연구원, 2006, 지하수시스템 통합해석기술개발 (I), KR-2004-(연차)-07-2004-R, p. 46-47
  •  
  • 6. Boman, G.K., Molz, F.J., and Boone, K.D., 1997, Borehole flowmeter application in fluvial sediments: Methodology, Result, and Assessment, Ground Water, 35(3), 443-450
  •  
  • 7. Bouwer, H. and Rice, R.C., 1976, A slug test for determining hydraulic conductivity of unconfined aquifers with completely or partially penetrating well, Water Resources Research, 12, 423-28
  •  
  • 8. de Marsily, Gh., Delay, F., Gonalvs, J., Renard, Ph., Teles, V., and Violette, S., 2005, Dealing with spatial heterogeneity, Hydrogeology Journal, 13(1), 161-183
  •  
  • 9. Ji, S. H., Yeo, I. W., Lee, K. K., and Glass, R. J., 2003, Influence of ambient groundwater flow on DNAPL migration in a fracture network: Experiments and simulations, Geophysical Research Letters, 30(10), 1504, doi:10.1029/2003 GL 017064
  •  
  • 10. Newman, SP., 2005, Trends, prospects and challenges in quantifying flow and transport through fractured rocks, Hydrogeology Journal, 13(1)124-147
  •  
  • 11. Palillet, F.L., 1993, Using borehole geophysics and cross-borehole flow testing to define hydraulic connections between fracture zones in bedrock aquifers, Journal of Applied Geophysics, 30, 261-279
  •  
  • 12. Paillet, F.L., 1998, Flow modeling and permeability estimation using borehole flow logs in heterogeneous fractured formations, Water Resources Research, 34(5), 997-1010
  •  
  • 13. Paillet, F.L., 2000, A field technique for estimating aquifer parameters using flow log data, Ground Water, 38(4), 510-52
  •  
  • 14. Paillet, F.L. and Crowder, R.E., 1996, A generalized approach for the interpretation of geophysical well logs in ground-water studies - Theory and Application, Ground Water, 34(5), 883- 898
  •  
  • 15. Paillet, F.L., Willams, J.H., Oki, D.S., and Knutson, K.D., 2002, Comparison of formation and fluid-column logs in a heterogeneous basalt aquifer, Ground Water, 40(6), 577-585
  •  
  • 16. Ruud, N.C. and Kabala, Z.J., 1996, Numerical evaluation of flowmeter test interpretation methodologies, Water Resources Research, 32(4), 845-852
  •  
  • 17. Williams, J.H. and Paillet, F.L., 2002, Using flowmeter pulse tests to define hydraulic connections in the subsurface: a fractured shale example, Journal of Hydrology, 265, 100-117
  •  

This Article

  • 2007; 12(3): 66-74

    Published on Jun 30, 2007