• Proposed Approach of Korean Ecological Risk Assessment for the Derivation of Soil Quality Criteria
  • An, Youn-Joo;Lee, Woo-Mi;Nam, Sun-Hwa;Jeong, Seung-Woo;
  • Department of Environmental Science, Konkuk University;Department of Environmental Science, Konkuk University;Department of Environmental Science, Konkuk University;Department of Environmental Engineering, Kunsan National University;
  • 토양준거치 도출을 위한 국내형 생태위해성평가기법 제안
  • 안윤주;이우미;남선화;정승우;
  • 건국대학교 환경과학과;건국대학교 환경과학과;건국대학교 환경과학과;군산대학교 환경공학과;
Abstract
Ecological Risk Assessment (ERA) supports a decision-making process such as establishment of environmental quality criteria. Soil quality criteria (SQC) are essential to protect soil organisms from the exposure to various soil contaminants. In this study, ERA methodologies of advanced countries for soil pollution were extensively compared to propose the ERA approach suitable for soil ecosystem in Korea. The soil ERAs in European Chemical Bureau(ECB), The Netherlands, and Canada can be classified as deterministic ecological risk assessment (DERA), and probabilistic ecological risk assessment (PERA) based on species sensitivity distribution (SSD). We propose three ERA methods according to abundance and reliability of soil ecotoxicity data. The method considered land use such as residential/agricultural, and industrial/commercial uses. The taxonomic groups of soil organism were classified as 'Class' level including different trophic levels (Magnoliopsida or Liliopsida, Clitellata, and Insecta or Secernentea). This study can be used to estimate the soil quality criteria to protect soil biota.

Keywords: Ecological Risk Assessment (ERA);Probabilistic Ecological Risk Assessment (PERA);Deterministic Ecological Risk Assessment (DERA);Species Sensitivity Distribution (SSD);Soil Quality Criteria (SQC);

References
  • 1. 국립환경과학원(NIER), 2005a, 납, 카드뮴 및 수은 오염에 대한 위해성평가 기법 연구.
  •  
  • 2. 국립환경과학원(NIER), 2005b, 위해우려물질 평가기법연구(III).
  •  
  • 3. 안윤주, 남선화, 이우미, 2009, 확률생태위해성평가(PERA) 선진국 사례분석 및 국내수계에 적합한 PERA 기법 제안, 한국물환경학회지, 25(4), 494-501.
  •  
  • 4. 환경부, 2005, 토양보전 기본계획 수립 연구.
  •  
  • 5. 환경부, 국립환경과학원, 2006, 물환경종합평가방법 개발 조사연구(III)-인체 및 수생태계 위해성평가 체계 구축.
  •  
  • 6. ASTM, 2002, Standard Guide for Conducting Laboratory Soil Toxicity Tests with the Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, E 2172-01.
  •  
  • 7. CCME, 2006, A Protocol for the Derivation of Environmental and Human Health Soil Quality Guideline .
  •  
  • 8. EC, 1988, Testing Method, C8. Toxicity for earthworms; Artificial Soil Test.
  •  
  • 9. EC, 2003, Technical Guidance Document on Risk AssessmentPart II.
  •  
  • 10. EC, 2007, Risk Assessment Report-Cadmium Oxide and Cadmium Metal.
  •  
  • 11. KS, 2005, 토양의 질, 토양오염물질에 의한 Collembola(Folsomia candida) 생식저해.
  •  
  • 12. KS, 2006, 토양의 질(생물학적 방법), 고등식물의 만성독성.
  •  
  • 13. RIVM, 2001, Guidance Document on Deriving Environmental Risk Limits.
  •  
  • 14. RIVM, 2008, Manual for summarising and evaluating environmental aspects of plant protection product.
  •  
  • 15. OECD, 1984a, OECD Guideline for Testing of Chemicals, Terrestrial Plants, Growth Test #208.
  •  
  • 16. OECD, 1984b, OECD Guideline for Testing of Chemicals, Earthworm Acute Toxicity Test #207.
  •  
  • 17. OECD, 2004, OECD Guideline for Testing of Chemicals, Earthworm Reproduction Test (Eisenia fetida/Eisenia andrei) #222.
  •  
  • 18. US EPA, 1996a, Ecological Effects Test Guidelines; OPPTS 850.4100 Terrestrial Plant Toxicity-Tier(Seedling Emergence), EPA/712/C-96/153.
  •  
  • 19. US EPA, 1996b, Ecological Effects Test Guidelines; OPPTS 850.4230 Early Seedling Growth Toxicity Test, EPA/712/C-96/347.
  •  
  • 20. US EPA, 1996c, Ecological Effects Test Guidelines; OPPTS 850.6200 Earthworm Subchronic Toxicity Test, EPA/712/C-96/167.
  •  
  • 21. US EPA, 1998, Guideline for Ecological Risk Assessment, EPA/630/R-95/002F.
  •  

This Article

  • 2010; 15(3): 7-14

    Published on Jun 30, 2010

  • Received on Feb 9, 2010
  • Revised on Feb 17, 2010
  • Accepted on Apr 14, 2010