• A Comparative Application of DRASTIC and SINTACS Models for The Assessment of Groundwater Vulnerability of Buyeo Area
  • Kang, Jin-Hee;Park, Eun-Gyu;
  • Dept. of Geolgy, Kyungpook National University;Dept. of Geolgy, Kyungpook National University;
  • DRASTIC과 SINTACS 모델의 비교적용에 의한 부여읍 일대의 지하수 오염 취약성 평가
  • 강진희;박은규;
  • 경북대학교 지질학과;경북대학교 지질학과;
Abstract
In this study, we applied DRASTIC and SINTACS models for the assessment of groundwater vulnerability to Buyeo-eup area in Buyeo-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, Korea. Currently, DRASTIC model is a main tool for the assessment of groundwater vulnerability, which has been widely applied for the multiple purposes related to local developments, construction projects, groundwater investigations, etc. since 1980s. Because DRASTIC model has been the sole tool used for the domestic environment, there has been doubt about the degree of reliability of the model, and a benchmark model has been sought by the many practitioners. The objective of this study is to check the applicability of SINTACS model to domestic environment, which is the first attempt in Korea as far as authors understand. The comparative results show that the DRASTIC assessment underestimates groundwater vulnerability of the aquifers composed of fractured bedrocks while that from the SINTACS model is relatively higher. Through this study, it is expected that SINTACS model serves as a reasonable alternative of DRASTIC model where the subsurface is composed of more than two different media such as fractured rocks and alluvium.

Keywords: DRASTIC;SINTACS;Overlay-and-index;Groundwater;Vulnerability;

References
  • 1. 건설교통부, 2002, 지하수관리 기본계획, p. 95.
  •  
  • 2. 기상청, 1972-2001, 부여 기상연보, http://www.kma.go.kr/.
  •  
  • 3. 김규범, 2008, 지하수 오염취약성 평가 기법 동향과 국내 적용성 고찰, 지하수토양환경, 13(6), 1-16.
  •  
  • 4. 농림부, 2000, 농어촌 지역 지하수 자원의 오염 예측도 작성 기법에 관한 연구, p. 27.
  •  
  • 5. 이사로, 김윤종, 1996, DRASTIC SYSTEM을 이용한 지하수 오염 가능성 및 위험 분석 연구, 한국GIS, 4(1), 1-11.
  •  
  • 6. 이현주, 박은규, 김강주, 박기훈, 2008, DRASTIC 모델 및 지하수 수치모사 연계 적용에 의한 부여읍 일대의 지하수 오염취약성 평가, 지하수토양환경, 13(1), 77-91.
  •  
  • 7. 조시범, 민경덕, 우남칠, 이사로, 1999, GIS를 이용한 경기도 평택군 지역의 지하수 오염 가능성 평가 연구, 지하수토양환경, 6(2), 87-94.
  •  
  • 8. 조시범, 손호웅, 2004, 지하수 오염 예측을 위한 GIS 활용 연구, 지구물리, 7(2), 121-134.
  •  
  • 9. 한국수자원공사, 2002, 금강권역 광역 지하수 조사, p. 257.
  •  
  • 10. Aller, L., Bennet, T., Lehr, J.H., Petty, R.J., and Hacket, G., 1987, DRASTIC: a standardised system for evaluating ground water pollution potential using hydrogeologic settings, USEPA, p.455.
  •  
  • 11. Civita, M., 1994, Le carte della vulnerabilita' degli acquiferi all'inquinamento: Teoria & pratica, Pitagora Editrice, Bologna, p. 325.
  •  
  • 12. Civita, M. and De Maio, M., 1997, SINTACS: un sistema parametrico per la valutazione e la cartografia della vulnerabilita degli acquiferi all'inquinamento: metodologia e automatizzazione [SINTACS: a parametric system for the assessment and mapping of the groundwater vulnerability to contamination: methodology and automation], Pitagora Editrice, Bologna, 60, p. 208.
  •  
  • 13. Civita, M. and De Maio, M., 2004, Assessing and mapping groundwater vulnerability to contamination: The Italian "combined" approach, Geof ' sica International, 43(4), 513-532.
  •  
  • 14. Civita, M. and De Regibus, C., 1995, Sperimentazione di alcune metodologie per la valutazione della vulnerabilita degli aquiferi, Pitagora Editrice, Bologna, 3, 63-71.
  •  
  • 15. Doerfliger, N. and Zwahlen, F., 1997, EPIK: a new method for outlining of protection areas in karstic environment. In: Gunay G, Jonshon AI (eds) International symposium and field seminar on "karst waters and environmental impacts", Antalya, Turkey, Balkema, Rotterdam, 117-123.
  •  
  • 16. McDonald, M.G., and Harbaugh, A.W., 1988, A Modular Three-Dimensional Finite-Difference Groundwater flow model, U.S. Geological Survey, p. 586.
  •  
  • 17. National Research Council, 1993, Ground water vulnerability assessment: Predicting relative contamination potential under conditions of uncertainty, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, p. 42-63.
  •  
  • 18. Foster, S.S.D., 1987, Fundamental concepts in aquifer vulnerability, pollution risk and protection strategy, van Duijvenbooden, W., van Waegeningh, H.G. (Eds.), Vulnerability of Soils and Groundwater to Pollution, TNO Committee on Hydrological Research, The Hague. Vulnerability of soil and groundwater to pollutants, Proceedings and Information, 38, p. 69-86.
  •  
  • 19. Gogu, R.C. and Dassargues, A., 2000, Current trends and future challenges in groundwater vulnerability assessment using overlay and index methods, Environmental Geology, 39(6), 549-559.
  •  
  • 20. Turc, L., 1961, Estimation of irrigation water requirements, potential evapotranspiration: A simple climatic formula evolved up to date, Ann. Agron., 12, 13-49.
  •  

This Article

  • 2010; 15(5): 32-39

    Published on Oct 31, 2010

  • Received on Aug 6, 2010
  • Accepted on Oct 7, 2010