• Estimation of Hydraulic Parameters of a Fractured Rock Aquifer Using Derivative Analysis
  • Kim, Bum-Su;Yang, Dong-Chul;Yeo, In-Wook;
  • Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Chonnam National University;Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Chonnam National University;Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Chonnam National University;
  • 변동량 분석을 이용한 암반대수층의 수리학적 매개변수 산출
  • 김범수;양동철;여인욱;
  • 전남대학교 지구환경과학부;전남대학교 지구환경과학부;전남대학교 지구환경과학부;
Abstract
Derivative analysis, based on the derivative of the drawdown as a function of time (i.e., rate of drawdown change), was applied to the evaluation of hydraulic parameters of the aquifer as an aid of the aquifer test interpretation based on the Theis solutions. Pumping tests were conducted at a coastal fractured aquifer in Muan county, Korea, of which the drawdown data, measured at the two observation wells, were used for derivative analysis. Wellbore storage and transition period were hard to identify at conventional log-log and semi long plots, but was easily recognized by distinctive curves of positive unit slope, hump and negative unit slope in the derivative plot. For the observation well of OW-2 at which wellbore storage and transition lasted over an hour, conventional aquifer analysis would suffer from the uniqueness problems and in further result in erroneous hydraulic parameters. Derivative analysis was found to be effective for distinguishing the drawdown data directly reflecting the aquifer property from those reflecting non aquifer effects such as wellbore storage and transition, which offers a unified methodology to yield correct hydraulic parameters from aquifer test data.

Keywords: Aquifer test;Derivative analysis;Hydraulic parameter;Uniqueness problem;Wellbore storage;

References
  • 1. 박학윤, 2008, 시계열분석, 물리검층 및 유수시험을 통한 전남 무안 균열암반대에서의 해수침투 특성 연구, 전남대학교 석사학위 논문, p. 77.
  •  
  • 2. 최승오, 고중배, 1971, 한국지질도 무안도폭(1:50,000) 및 설명서, 국립지질조사소, p. 11.
  •  
  • 3. Beauheim, R.L. and Pickens, J.F., 1986, Applicability of pressure derivative to hydraulic test analysis. Paper presented at poster session at the Annual Meeting of American Geophysical Union, Baltimore, 19-22.
  •  
  • 4. Bourdet, D. and Whittle, T.M., 1983a, A new set of curves simplifies well test analysis, World Oil, 95-106.
  •  
  • 5. Bourdet, D., Ayoub, J.A., Pirard, Y.M., and Kniazeff, V., 1983b, Interpreting well tests in fractured reservoirs, World Oil, 77-78.
  •  
  • 6. Bourdet, D., Ayoub, J.A., and Pirard, Y.M., 1989, Use of pressure derivative in well-test interpretation, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 4, 293-302.
  •  
  • 7. Ehlig-Economides, C., 1988, Use of the pressure derivative for diagnosing pressure-transient vehavior, Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1280-1282.
  •  
  • 8. Horne, R.N., 1995, Modern well test analysis: A computer-aided approach. p. 257.
  •  
  • 9. Karasaki, K., Long, J.C.S., and Witherspoon, P.A., 1988, Analytical models of slug tests, Water Resources Research, 24(1), 115-126.
  •  
  • 10. Kevin, P.Parks and Laurence, R.Bentley, 1996, Derivativeassisted evaluation of well yields in a heterogeneous aquifer, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 33, 458-469.
  •  
  • 11. Philippe Renard, Damian Glenz, and Miguel Mejias, 2008, Understanding diagnostic plots for well-test interpretation, Hydrogeology Journal, 20.
  •  
  • 12. Samani, N., Pasandi, M., and Barry, D.A., 2006, Characterizing a heterogeneous aquifer by derivative analysis of pumping and recovery test data, Journal of Geological Society of Iran, 1, 29- 41.
  •  
  • 13. Spane, F.A.Jr. and Wurstner, S.K., 1993, Deriv: A computer program for calculating pressure derivatives for use in hydraulic test analysis, Ground Water, 31(5), 814-822.
  •  

This Article

  • 2010; 15(6): 46-52

    Published on Dec 31, 2010

  • Received on Aug 26, 2010
  • Accepted on Nov 16, 2010