• Simultaneous Removal of Heavy Metals and Diesel-fuel from a Soil Column by Surfactant Foam Flushing
  • Heo, Jung-Hyun;Jeong, Seung-Woo;
  • Department of Environmental Engineering, Kunsan National University;Department of Environmental Engineering, Kunsan National University;
  • 계면활성제 거품(Foam)을 이용한 토양칼럼 내 유류 및 중금속 동시 제거 연구
  • 허정현;정승우;
  • 군산대학교 환경공학과;군산대학교 환경공학과;
Abstract
Simultaneous removal of heavy metals (Cd, Pb) and diesel-fuel from a soil column was evaluated by respectively flushing with sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) solution, mixture of SDS and sodium iodide (SDS + NaI), and surfactant foam (SDS + NaI foam). First, this study evaluated these flushing methods to the heavy metals only-contaminated soil for removal of heavy metals from the heavy-metal only contaminated soil column. After 7 pore volume flushing of the soil column, Cd removal efficiencies from the soil were 40% by SDS solution, 50% by SDS + NaI mixture, and 60% by surfactant foam. The flushing results implied that anionic surfactant and ligand can be efficiently applied to extraction of Cd from the heavy metal contaminated soil. Furthermore, surfactant foam flushing showed an increased flushing efficiency with enhancing the contact between surfactant solution and soil. However, Pb removal efficiency by these flushing methods did not show any difference unlike those of Cd. Second, this study eventually evaluated flushing methods for simultaneous removal of heavy metals and diesel-fuel from the soil column with 7 pore volume flushing. Diesel-fuel removal efficiencies were 50% by SDS + NaI flushing and 90% by SDS + NaI foam flushing. Cd removal efficiency by the foam flushing reached to 80% which was higher than the result of the previous heavy metals onlycontaminated soil experiment. This result implied that diesel-fuel could act as a metal-solvent while it contacted to heavy metals present in the soil. This study clearly showed that surfactant foam flushing simultaneously removed heavy metals and diesel fuel from the soil column.

Keywords: Soil flushing;Surfactant;Heavy metal;Fuel;Foam;

References
  • 1. 김수삼, 김병일, 한상재, 김정환, 2003, 납으로 오염된 철성분 함유토의 동전기 정화 특성에 세척제가 미치는 영향, 지하수토양환경, 9(1), 54-62.
  •  
  • 2. 김용식, 손영규, 김지형, 송지현, 2005, Toluene의 생물학적 분해능 향상을 위한 계면활성제의 선정, 지하수토양환경, 10(4), 26-32.
  •  
  • 3. 부산시, 2003, 문현지구 토양환경 복원사업의 성공적 성과사례-문현금융단지 오염부지 정화사업중심 연구보고서
  •  
  • 4. 이민희, 정상용, 최상일, 강동환, 김민철, 2002, 계면활성제 원위치 토양 세정법을 이용한 유류 오염 지역 토양. 지하수 정화 실증 시험, 지하수토양환경, 7(4), 77-86.
  •  
  • 5. 허정현, 정승우, 2008, NaI 리간드화 계면활성제에 의한 토양 내 Cd과 Pb 추출연구, 지하수토양환경, 13(5), 74-80.
  •  
  • 6. Chowdiah, P., Misra, B.R., Kilbane , J.J., Sivastava, V.J., and Hayes, T.D., 1998, Foam propagation through soils for enhanced in-situ remediation, Journal of hazardous materials, 62, 265-280.
  •  
  • 7. Chu, W. and Chan, K.H., 2003, The mechanism of the surfactant-aided soil washing system for hydrophobic and partial hydrophobic organics, The Science of the Total Environment, 307, 83-92.
  •  
  • 8. Huh, D.G., Cochrane, T.D., and Kovarik, F.S., 1989, The effect of microscopic heterogeneity on $CO_2$ foam mobility: part 1- mechanistic study. J. Pet. Technol. 41(8), 872-879.
  •  
  • 9. Jeong S-W. and Corapcioglu, M.Y., 2003, A micromodel analysis of factors influencing NAPL removal by surfactant foam flooding, Jour. Contam. Hydrol. 60, 77-96.
  •  
  • 10. Jeong, S-W. and Corapcioglu, M.Y., 2005, Force analysis and visualization of NAPL removal during surfactant-related floods in a porous medium, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 126(1-3), 8-13.
  •  
  • 11. Mulligan. C.N. and Wang, S., 2006, Remediation of a heavy metal-contaminated soil by a rhamnolipid foam, Engineering Geology, 85, 75-81.
  •  
  • 12. Mulligan, C.N., Yong, R.N., and Gibbs, B.F., 2001, Surfactant-enhanced remediation of contaminated soil: a review, Engineering Geology, 60, 371-380.
  •  
  • 13. Owete, O.S. and Brigham, W.E., 1987, Flow behavior of foam porous micromodel study, SPE Reserv. Eng. 2(8), 315- 323.
  •  
  • 14. Shin, M., Barrington, S.F., Marshall, W.D., and Kim, J.W., 2005, Effect of surfactant alkyl chin length on soil cadmium desorption using surfactant/ligand systems, Chemosphere, 58, 735-742.
  •  
  • 15. SSSA, 2002, Methods of Soil Analysis, Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Wisconsin, USA.
  •  
  • 16. St-Pierre, C., Martel, R., Gabriel, U., Lefebvre, R., Robert, T., and Hawari, J., 2004, TCE recovery mechanisms using micellar and alcohol solutions: phase diagrams and sand column experiments, Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 71, 155-192.
  •  
  • 17. Taylor, T.P, Rathfelder, K.M., Pennell, K.D., and Abriola, L.M., 2004, Effects of ethanol addition on micellar solubilization and plume migration during surfactant enhanced recovery of tetrachloroethene, Jour. Contam. Hydrol., 69(1-2), 73-99.
  •  
  • 18. USEPA, 1997, Recent Developments for In Situ Treatment of Metal Contaminated Soils, EPA/542/R97/004, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington DC.
  •  
  • 19. USEPA, 2001, Treatment Technologies for Site Cleanup: Annual Status Report, EPA/542/R01/004, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington DC.
  •  
  • 20. Wang, S. and Mulligan, C.N., 2004, Rhamnolipid Foam enhanced remediation of Cadmium and Nickel contaminated soil, Water, Air & Soil Pollut., 157, 315-330.
  •  
  • 21. Whitten, K.W. Davis, R.E., Peck, M.L., and Stanley, G.G., 2006, General Chemistry, Thomson Learning Inc.
  •  

This Article