• Evaluation of Remediation Efficiency of In-Situ Chemical Oxidation Technology Applying Micro Bubble Ozone Oxidizer Coupled with Pneumatic Fracturing Equipment
  • Oh, Seung-Taek;Oh, Cham-Teut;Kim, Guk-Jin;Seok, So-Hee;Kim, Chul-Kyung;Lim, Jin-Hwan;Ryu, Jae-Bong;Chang, Yoon-Young;
  • OIKOS Co. Ltd.;OIKOS Co. Ltd.;OIKOS Co. Ltd.;Korea Railroad Corporation;Department of Advanced Chemical Engineering, Mokwon University;Department of Environmental Engineering, Kwangwoon University;Department of Environmental Engineering, Kwangwoon University;Department of Environmental Engineering, Kwangwoon University;
  • 마이크로버블 오존 산화제와 공압파쇄 장치를 연계 적용한 지중 화학적 산화법의 정화효율 평가
  • 오승택;오참뜻;김국진;석소희;김철경;임진환;유재봉;장윤영;
  • (주)오이코스;(주)오이코스;(주)오이코스;한국철도공사;목원대학교 신소재화학공학과;광운대학교 환경공학과;광운대학교 환경공학과;광운대학교 환경공학과;
Abstract
A new type of chemical oxidation technology utilizing micro bubble ozone oxidizer and a pneumatic fracturing equipment was developed to enhance field applicability of a traditional chemical oxidation technology using hydrogen peroxide as an oxidizer for in-situ soil remediation. To find an efficient way to dissolve gaseous ozone into hydrogen peroxide, ozone was injected into water as micro bubble form then dissolved ozone concentration and its duration time were measured compared to those of simple aeration of gaseous ozone. As a result, dissolved ozone concentration in water increased by 31% (1.6 ppm ${\rightarrow}$ 2.1 ppm) and elapsed time for which maximum ozone concentration decreased by half lengthened from 9 min to 33 min. When the developed pneumatic fracturing technology was applied in sandy loam, cracks were developed and grown in soil for 5~30 seconds so that the radius of influence got longer by 71% from 392 cm to 671 cm. The remediation system using the micro bubble ozone oxidizer and the pneumatic fracturing equipment for field application was made and demonstrated its remediation efficiency at petroleum contaminated site. The system showed enhanced remediation capacity than the traditional chemical oxidation technology using hydrogen peroxide with reduced remediation time by about 33%.

Keywords: Micro bubble ozone oxidizer;Pneumatic fracturing;In-situ chemical oxidation;Field demonstration;Radius of influence;

References
  • 1. 권미선, 박은규, 이철효, 김용성, 김남진, 2010, 비포화대 오염정화 설계를 위한 공압파쇄 모사 해석, 지하수토양환경, 15(6), 53-63.
  •  
  • 2. 김종태, 정교철, 부성안, 김진성, 김혜빈, 2004, 공압파쇄를 이용한 지하수량 증가에 대한 연구, 지질공학회지, 14(2), 189-197.
  •  
  • 3. 이순화, 정계주, 권진하, 이세한, 2010, 잉여슬러지 가용화를 위한 마이크로버블 오존 이용에 관한 연구, 대한환경공학회지, 32(4), 325-332.
  •  
  • 4. 이인규, 이은영, 이혜정, 이기세, 2011, 마이크로버블 오존 고도 산화를 이용한 축산폐수 혐기소화 배출수의 COD와 색도의 제거, 공업화학, 22(6), 617-622.
  •  
  • 5. 정교철, 김기종, 부성안, 서용석, 2002, 공압파쇄를 고려한 단일 불연속면에서의 간극에 다른 투수성 변화에 대한 연구, 지질공학회지, 12(2), 151-166.
  •  
  • 6. Andreozzi, R., Insola, A., Caprio, V., and D'Amore, M.G., 1991, Ozonation of pyridine in aqueous solution: mechanistic and kinetic aspects, Wat. Res., 25, 655-659.
  •  
  • 7. Barid, N.C., 1997, Free radical reactions in aqueous solutions: examples from advanced oxidation processes for wastewater and from the chemistry in airborne water droplets, J. Chem. Edu., 74(7), 817-819.
  •  
  • 8. Beckett, G.D. and Huntley, D., 1994, Characterization of flow parameters controlling soil vapor extraction, Ground Wat., 32(2), 239-247.
  •  
  • 9. Duguet, J.P., Anselme, C., Mazounie, P., and Mallevialle, J., 1990, Application of combined ozone-hydrogen peroxide for the removal of aromatic compounds from a groundwater, Ozone: Sci. Eng.: J. Inter. Ozone Association, 12(3), 281-294.
  •  
  • 10. Frank, U. and Barkley, N., 1995, Remediation of low permeability subsurface formations by fracturing enhancement of soil vapor extraction, J. Hazard. Mater., 40, 191-201.
  •  
  • 11. Gulyas, H., Bismarck, R.V., and Hemmerling, L., 1995, Treatment of industrial waste waters with ozone/hydrogen peroxide, Wat. Sci. Tech., 32(7), 127-134.
  •  
  • 12. Hantush, M.S. and Jacob, C.E., 1955, Non-steady radial flow in an infinite leaky aquifer, Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, 36(1), 95-112.
  •  
  • 13. Hsu, I., 1995, The use of gaseous ozone to remediate the contaminants in the unsaturated soils, Ph. D. thesis, Michigan State Univ.
  •  
  • 14. ITRCWG(Interstate Technology and regulatory Cooperation Work Group), 2001, Technical and regulatory guidance for in situ chemical oxidation of contaminated soil and groundwater, Technical/Regulatory Guidelines, In situ chemical oxidation work team, 25.
  •  
  • 15. Kong, S.H., Watts, R.J., and Choi, J.H., 1998, Treatment of peroleum contaminated soils using iron mineral catalyzed hydrogen peroxide, Chemosphere, 37(8), 1473-1482.
  •  
  • 16. Masten, S.J. and Davies, S.R., 1997, Efficacy of in-situ ozonation for the remediation of PAH contaminated soils, J. Contam. Hydrology, 28, 327-335.
  •  
  • 17. Masten, S.J., 1991, Use of insitu ozonation for the removal of VOCs and PAHs from unsaturated soils, in Proceedings of the symposium on soil venting, Houston, Texas, 29-53.
  •  
  • 18. Mitani, M.M., Keller, A.A., Bunton, C.A., Rinker, R.G., and Sandall O.C., 2002, Kinetics and products of reactions of MTBE with ozone and ozone/hydrogen peroxide in water, J. Hazard. Mater., B89, 197-212.
  •  
  • 19. Schuring, J.R., Chan, P.C., Liskowitz, J.W., Papanicolaou, P., and Bruening, C.T., 1991, Method and apparatus for eliminating non-naturally occurring subsurface liquid toxic contaminants from soil, U.S. Patent No. 5,032,042.
  •  
  • 20. Schuring, J.R., Kosson, D.S., Fitzgerald, C.D., and Venkatraman, S., 1996, Pneumatic fracturing and multicomponent injection enhancement of in situ bioremediation, U.S. Patent No. 5,560,737.
  •  
  • 21. Staehelln, J. and Holgne, J., 1982, Decomposition of ozone in water: rate of initiation by hydroxide ions and hydrogen peroxide, Environ. Sci. Technol., 16, 676-681.
  •  
  • 22. Stowell, J.P. and Jensen, J.N., 1991, Dechlorination of chlorendic acid with ozone, Wat. Res., 25, 83-90.
  •  
  • 23. Theis, C.V., 1935, The relationship between the lowering of the piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using ground-water storage, Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, 2, 519-524.
  •  
  • 24. TRCC (ThermoRetec Consulting Corporation), HydroGeo- Logic, Inc., Coleman Research Corporation-Energy & environmental Group, 1999, In situ oxidation (Technology status review), Environmental Security Certification Program, USA, 42.
  •  
  • 25. USACE, 1995, Soil vapor extraaction and bioventing. EM 1110-1-4001, USACE, Department of Army, Washington, DC.
  •  
  • 26. Venkatraman, S.N., Schuring, J.R., Boland T.M., Bossert, I.D., and Kosson D.S., 1998, Application of pneumatic fracturing to enhance in situ bioremediation, J. Soil Contam., 7(2), 143-162.
  •  
  • 27. Watts, R.J., Bottenberg, B.C., Hess, T.F., Jensen, M.D., and Teel, A.L., 1999, Role of reductants in the enhanced desorption and transformation of chloraliphatic compounds by modified fenton's reactions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 33, 3432-3437.
  •  

This Article

  • 2012; 17(4): 44-50

    Published on Aug 31, 2012

  • 10.7857/JSGE.2012.17.4.044
  • Received on Jul 24, 2012
  • Revised on Aug 11, 2012
  • Accepted on Aug 13, 2012