• Comparative study of Ecological Risk Assessment : Deriving Soil Ecological Criteria
  • Lee, Woo-Mi;Kim, Shin Woong;Jeong, Seung-Woo;An, Youn-Joo;
  • Department of Environmental Science, Konkuk University;Department of Environmental Science, Konkuk University;Department of Environmental Engineering, Kunsan National University;Department of Environmental Science, Konkuk University;
  • 토양생태계 위해성평가기법 비교연구: 토양생태준거치 산정을 중심으로
  • 이우미;김신웅;정승우;안윤주;
  • 건국대학교 환경과학과;건국대학교 환경과학과;군산대학교 환경공학과;건국대학교 환경과학과;
Abstract
The purpose of ecological risk assessment in soil ecosystem is to protect ecological receptors and to provide a scheme of efficient management for soil contaminants. Developed countries have already prepared the methodologies of ecological risk assessment by considering their soil properties, land use, and ecological receptors. In this study, we compared the soil ecological risk assessment processes in the similarity and differences in methodology. Four countries, except for USA, adjusted the toxicological data for ecological risk assessment, based on their representative soil properties because the soil properties affect toxic effects to ecological receptors. The soil ecological risk assessment methodology of Netherlands and UK was based on 'Technical guidance document on risk assessment (TGD)' of European Chemical Bureau (ECB). Australia, USA, and Canada developed their autonomous methodology. In the Netherlands, UK, Australia, and Canada, they employed the species sensitivity distribution (SSD) approach if sufficient toxicity data are available. The USA determined the ecological soil screening level by obtaining the geometric mean of toxicological data for three species. Furthermore, all countries consider secondary poisoning in their soil ecological risk assessment. The latest risk assessment methodology of soil ecosystem that this study investigated can be used to explore what Korea needs to develop the Korean ecological risk assessment methodology of soil ecosystem in the future.

Keywords: Ecological risk assessment;Ecological receptor;Soil ecosystem;Species sensitivity distribution (SSD);

References
  • 1. An, Y.-J., Lee, W.-M., Nam, S.-H., and Jeong, S.-W., 2010, Proposed approach of Korean ecological risk assessment for the derivation of soil quality criteria, J. Soil & Groundwater Env., 15(3), 7-14.
  •  
  • 2. CCME (Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment), 2006, A Protocol for the Derivation of Environmental and Human Health Soil Quality Guideline.
  •  
  • 3. EA (Environment Agency), 2008a, An ecological risk assessment framework for contaminants in soil.
  •  
  • 4. EA (Environment Agency), 2008b, Guidance on the use of soil screening values in ecological risk assessment.
  •  
  • 5. ECB (European Chemical Bureau), 2003, Technical guidance document on risk assessment.
  •  
  • 6. ECB (European Chemical Bureau), 2012, European Union Risk Assessment Report: Nickel and nickel compounds.
  •  
  • 7. MOE (Ministry of Environment), 2005, Road map of a master plan for soil preservation.
  •  
  • 8. MOE/NIER (Ministry of Environment/National Institute of Environmental Research), 2006, Development of integrated methodology for evaluation of water environment (III)-Establishment of risk assessment systems for human and aquatic ecosystem.
  •  
  • 9. MOE (Ministry of Environment), 2007, Risk assessment of lead, mercury, and cadmium and risk management plan.
  •  
  • 10. MOE (Ministry of Environment), 2009, Master plan for soil preservation.
  •  
  • 11. NEPC (National Environment Protection Council), 2011a, Assessment of site contamination-Schedule B5a: Guideline on ecological risk assessment.
  •  
  • 12. NEPC (National Environment Protection Council), 2011b, Assessment site contamination-Schedule B5b: methodology to derive ecological investigation levels in contaminated soil.
  •  
  • 13. NIER (National Institute of Environmental Research), 2005a, Risk assessment of lead, cadmium, and mercury.
  •  
  • 14. NIER (National Institute of Environmental Research), 2005b, Study on the methodology for evaluation of potential hazardous pollutants (II).
  •  
  • 15. NIER (National Institute of Environmental Research), 2005c, Study on the methodology for evaluation of potential hazardous pollutants (III).
  •  
  • 16. RIVM (National Institute for Public Health and the Environment), 1994, Guidance document on the derivation of ecotoxicological criteria for serious soil contamination in view of the intervention value for soil clean-up.
  •  
  • 17. RIVM, 1995, Derivation of the ecological serious soil contamination concentration.
  •  
  • 18. RIVM, 2001a, Guidance document on deriving environmental risk limits.
  •  
  • 19. RIVM, 2001b, Technical evaluation of intervention values for soil/sediment and groundwater.
  •  
  • 20. RIVM, 2001c, Ecotoxicological serious risk concentrations for soil, sediment, and (ground) water: updated proposals for first series of compounds.
  •  
  • 21. RIVM, 2007, Guidance for the derivation of environmental risk limits within the framework of 'International and national environmental quality standards for substances in the Netherlands' (INS).
  •  
  • 22. US EPA, 2005, Guidance for developing ecological soil screening levels.
  •  

This Article

  • 2012; 17(5): 1-9

    Published on Oct 31, 2012

  • 10.7857/JSGE.2012.17.5.001
  • Received on Jun 20, 2012
  • Revised on Oct 16, 2012
  • Accepted on Oct 17, 2012