• Chemical Ranking and Scoring Methodology for the Drinking and non-drinking Groundwater pollutants: CROWN (Chemical Ranking of Groundwater PollutaNts)
  • An, Youn-Joo;Lee, Woo-Mi;Jeong, Seung-Woo;
  • Department of Environmental Science, Konkuk University;Department of Environmental Science, Konkuk University;Department of Environmental Engineering, Kunsan National University;
  • 음용 및 비음용 지하수 우선관리대상 항목 선정기법: CROWN (Chemical Ranking of Groundwater PollutaNts)
  • 안윤주;이우미;정승우;
  • 건국대학교 환경과학과;건국대학교 환경과학과;군산대학교 환경공학과;
Abstract
The Korean groundwater law regulates 20 groundwater contamination parameters, including 14 specific harmful substances. Expanding the number of groundwater quality standards are needed to cope with recent groundwater quality deterioration due to the use of various chemicals. Chemical ranking and scoring system (CRS) is a scientific tool to sort priority chemicals by considering exposure and toxicity potentials. In this study, we developed a CRS for scoring and ranking of possible groundwater pollutants and screened priority substances to be later considered in the Korean standard expansion. Chemical Ranking Of groundWater pollutaNts (CROWN) incorporates important parameters consisting of exposure potential, human and water ecotoxicity, interests, and certainty. Furthermore, CROWN additionally evaluated existence of other media standards to consider impacts by contamination of other media. The 197 substances that were common to 9 countries were selected first. CROWN evaluated and ranked each chemical, and finally suggested priority substances. Suggested priority substances were classified into two groups according to the groundwater use purposes: drinking and non-drinking. The priority substances were further classified into $1^{st}$ and $2^{nd}$ group priorities. The $1^{st}$ group consists of 75 substances, including the all the Korean groundwater standard parameters. CROWN will be used in selecting groundwater pollutants for possible inclusion in the Korean standard expansion.

Keywords: Chemical ranking and scoring (CRS);Groundwater;Groundwater quality standard;Groundwater pollutants;

References
  • 1. Ali, B., 2001, Multistakeholder collaboration outcomes in environmental voluntary initiatives: The case of A.R.E.T. initative.
  •  
  • 2. An, Y.-J., Jeong, S.-W., Kim, T.-S., Lee, W.-M., Nam, S.-H., and Beak, Y.-B., 2008, Assessment factors for the selection of priority soil contaminants based on the comparative analysis of chemical ranking and scoring systems, J. of Soil & Groundwater Env. 13(6), 62-71.
  •  
  • 3. APAT, 2004, Qualita' Acque Sotterranee.
  •  
  • 4. ATSDR, 2007, 2007 CERCLA Priority List of Hazardous Substances That Will Be The Subject of Toxicological Profiles and Support Document, Division of Toxicology, Washington DC., USA.
  •  
  • 5. BAFU, 2004, Wegleitung Grundwasserschutz.
  •  
  • 6. Choi, S.-P., Park, H.-S., Lee, D.-S., Shin, Y.-S., Kim, Y.-S., and Shin, D.-C., 2005, Development of CRS-Korea II and its application to setting the priority of toxic chemicals for local provinces, J Environ Toxicol, 20(4), 311-325.
  •  
  • 7. Danish EPA, 2002, Guidelines on remediation of contaminated sites.
  •  
  • 8. Environmental Agency of The Republic of Slovenia, 2008, Water quality in Slovenia.
  •  
  • 9. Hanset, B.G., van Haelst, A.G., Leeuwen, K.V., and van der Zandt, P., 1999, Priority setting for existing chemicals: European union risk ranking method, Environ Toxicol Chem, 18, 772-779.
  •  
  • 10. Irish EPA, 2003, Towards setting guideline values for the protection of groundwater in Ireland (Interim report)ion (2006/118/EC).
  •  
  • 11. Jeong, S.-W. and An, Y.-J., 2012, Construction of a chemical ranking system of soil pollution substances for screening of priority soil contaminants in Korea, Environ Monit Assess, 184, 2193-2204.
  •  
  • 12. Kim, Y.-S., Park, H.-S., Lee, D.-S., and Shin, D.-C., 2003, Comparisons of chemical ranking and scoring methods, J Environ Toxicol, 18(3), 183-191.
  •  
  • 13. Kim, G., Choi, D. Yoon, P., and Kim, K., 2010, Trends of groundwater quality in the areas with a high possibility of pollution, J Korean Geo environ Soc, 11(3), 5-16.
  •  
  • 14. MOE (Ministry of Environment), 1999, Environmental sourcebook.
  •  
  • 15. MOE (Ministry of Environment), 2003, Selection and Evaluation of risk concern materials.
  •  
  • 16. MOE (Ministry of Environment), 2005, Improved methods on groundwater quality management and pollution remediation.
  •  
  • 17. MOE/NIER (Ministry of Environment/National Institute of Environmental Research), 2006, Development of integrated methodology for evaluation of water environment (III)-Establishment of risk assessment systems for human and aquatic ecosystem.
  •  
  • 18. Nam, S.-H., Kwak, J.-I., Yoon, S.-J., Jeong, S.-W., and An, Y.-J., 2011, Chemical ranking and scoring methodology for the protection of human health and aquatic ecosystem in Korea surfacewater: CRAFT (Chemical RAnking of surFacewater polluTants), J Korean Soc Water Quality, 27(6), 804-812.
  •  
  • 19. NIER (National Institute of Environmental Research), 2007, Establishment of priority soil pollutants.
  •  
  • 20. NIER (National Institute of Environmental Research), 2010, Establishment of priority pollutants for human and aquatic ecosystem.
  •  
  • 21. Park, H.-S., Kim, Y.-S., Lee, D.-S., Shin, Y.-S., Choi, S.-P., Park, S.-E., Kim, M.-H., Yang, J.-Y., and Shin, D.-C., 2005, Development of Korea chemical ranking and scoring systems (CRSKorea) and its application to prioritizing national toxic chemicals, J Environ Toxicol, 20(2), 109-121.
  •  
  • 22. Snyder, E.M., Snyder, S.A., Giesy, J.P., Blonde, S.A., Hurlburt, G.K., Summer, C.L., Mitchell, R.R., and Bush, D.M., 2000, SCRAM: A scoring and ranking system for persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic substances for the North American Great lake. Part I. Structure of the scoring and ranking system. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 7, 51-61.
  •  
  • 23. Swanson, M.B., Davis, G.A., Kincaid, L.E., Schultz, T.W., Bartmess, J.E., Jones, S.L., and George, E.L., 1997, A screening method for ranking and scoring chemicals by potential human health and environmental impact. Environ Toxicol Chem, 16, 372-383.
  •  
  • 24. US EPA, 1994, Chemical hazard evaluation for management strategies: A method for ranking and scoring chemicals by potential human health and environmental impacts.
  •  
  • 25. WHO, 2006, Guidelines for drinking-water quality, 1st addendum to 3rd edition, Volume 1 Recommendations.
  •  

This Article

  • 2013; 18(1): 16-25

    Published on Feb 28, 2013

  • 10.7857/JSGE.2013.18.1.016
  • Received on Aug 17, 2012
  • Revised on Nov 28, 2012
  • Accepted on Nov 29, 2012