• Quantification of Uncertainty Associated with Soil Sampling and Its Reduction Approaches
  • Kim, Geonha;
  • Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hannam University;
  • 토양오염도 평가시 시료채취 불확실성 정량화 및 저감방안
  • 김건하;
  • 한남대학교 공과대학 건설시스템공학과;
Abstract
It is well known that uncertainty associated with soil sampling is bigger than that with analysis. In this research, uncertainties for soil sampling when assessing TPH and BTEX concentration in soils were quantified based on actual field data. It is almost impossible to assess exact contamination of the site regardless how carefully devised for sampling. Uncertainties associated with sample reduction for further chemical analysis were quantified approximately 10 times larger than those associated with core sampling on site. Bigger uncertainties occur when contamination level is low, sample quantity is small, and soil particle is coarse. To minimize the uncertainties on field, homogenization of soil sample is necessary and its procedures are proposed in this research as well.

Keywords: Sampling error;Sample preparation;Sampling protocol;Soil contamination;Uncertainty;

References
  • 1. KMOE, 2009, Sampling Preparation and Handling in Soil Contamination Regulation (ES01730), National Institute of Environmental Research.
  •  
  • 2. KMOE, 2007, Standard Procedure for Solid Waste Analysis (# 11-1480000-00863-01), National Institute of Environmental Research.
  •  
  • 3. Collins, K. and McGown, A., 1974, The form and function of microfabric features in a variety of natural soils, Geotechnique, 24, 223-254.
  •  
  • 4. Gy, P., 2004a, Sampling of discrete materials- a new introduction to the theory of sampling I. Qualitative approach, Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 74, 7-24.
  •  
  • 5. Gy, P., 2004b, Sampling of discrete materials II. Quantitative approach- sampling of zero-dimensional objects, Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 74, 25-38.
  •  
  • 6. Gy, P., 2004c, Sampling of discrete materials III. Quantitative approach- sampling of one-dimensional objects, Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 74, 39-47.
  •  
  • 7. Gustavsson, B., Luthbom, K., and Lagerkvist, A., 2006, " Comparison of analytical error and sampling error for contaminated soil", Journal of Hazardous Materials, B138 252-260.
  •  
  • 8. EPA, 1992, Preparation of Soil Sampling Protocols: Sampling Techniques and Strategies, United States Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/600/R-92/128.
  •  
  • 9. EPA, 1994, Standard Operating Procedures: Soil Sampling, SOP #2012, U.S. EPA Environmental Response Team.
  •  

This Article

  • 2013; 18(1): 94-101

    Published on Feb 28, 2013

  • 10.7857/JSGE.2013.18.1.094
  • Received on Dec 27, 2012
  • Revised on Feb 5, 2013
  • Accepted on Feb 6, 2013