• A Study on Pump and Treat Design through Evaluation of Radius of Influence
  • Kim, Jeong-Woo;Lee, Kang-Kun;
  • School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Seoul National University;School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Seoul National University;
  • 영향반경을 이용한 양수처리법 설계에 대한 연구
  • 김정우;이강근;
  • 서울대학교 지구환경과학부;서울대학교 지구환경과학부;
Abstract
It is necessary to decide the pumping rate and pumping well location together with the capture zone in order to determine an appropriate groundwater remediation strategy to manage the contaminated groundwater. The relationship between the capture zone and the drawdown radius of influence ($ROI_s$) was considered. $ROI_{cs}$ is defined as the distance where the criteria of drawdown is cs meter from pumping well in this paper. A method to decide the required pumping rate for the remediation of contaminated groundwater in order to create appropriate $ROI_{cs}$ is suggested by using the Theis equation (1935) and Cooper-Jacob equation (1946). It was shown in this study that $ROI_{cs}$ is in proportion to the pumping rate and the criteria of drawdown, which decides $ROI_{cs}$, is inversely proportional to Ti value (transmissivity ${\times}$ hydraulic gradient). The pumping rate which creates the required $ROI_{cs}$ could be planned through the relationship between the $ROI_{cs}$ and pumping rates ($ROI_{cs}$-Q curve) of the field sites 1, 2 and 3. If the drawdown is investigated along with Ti value and pumping rate at a specific site where pump and treat remediation is planned, it is expected that the required criteria of drawdown can be evaluated by using the relationship between the cs and Ti (cs-Ti curve).

Keywords: Pump and treat;Radius of influence (ROI);Capture zone;Criteria of drawdown (cs);

References
  • 1. Bair, E.S., Springer, A.E., and Roadcap, G.S., 1991, Delineation of travel time-related capture areas of wells using analytical flow models and particle-tracking analysis, Ground Water, 29(3), 387-397.
  •  
  • 2. Bair, E.S. and Roadcap, G.S., 1992, Comparison of flow models used to delineate capture zones of wells: 1. Leaky-confined fractured- carbonate aquifer, Ground Water, 30(2), 199-211.
  •  
  • 3. Blandford, T.N. and Huyakorn, P.S., 1989, WHPA: A modular semi-analytical model for delineation of Wellhead Protection Areas, USEPA, Office of Ground-Water Protection, Washington, D.C.
  •  
  • 4. Bonn, B.A. and Rounds, S.A., 1990, DREAM - Analytical Ground Water Flow Programs, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, p. 109.
  •  
  • 5. Buscher, W.E. and Cobb, R.P., 1990, Maximum Setback Zone Workbook. Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, p. 62.
  •  
  • 6. Cooper, H.H. and Jacob, C.E., 1946, A generalized graphical method for evaluating formation constants and summarizing well field history, Transaction of the American Geophysical Union, 27, 526-534.
  •  
  • 7. Driscoll, F.G., 1986, Groundwater and Wells. Johnson Division, St. Paul, Minnesota, p. 232.
  •  
  • 8. Fitts, C.R., 1989. Simple analytic functions for modeling threedimensional flow in layered aquifers, Water Resour. Res., 25(5), 943-948.
  •  
  • 9. Gorelick, S.M., Freeze, R.A., Donohue, D., and Keely, J.F., 1993, Groundwater Contamination: Optimal Capture and Containment, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, p. 385.
  •  
  • 10. Javendel, I., Doughty, C., and Tsang, C.F., 1984, Groundwater Transport: Handbook of Mathematical Models, American Geophysical Union Water Resources Monograph No. 10, Washington, D.C., p. 228.
  •  
  • 11. Javendel, I. and Tsang, C.F., 1986, Capture-zone type curves: A tool for aquifer cleanup, Ground Water, 24, 616-625.
  •  
  • 12. Kasenow, M.C., 1997, Introduction to Aquifer Analysis. 4th edition (with Aquifer Test Performance (ATP) computer program). Water Resources Publications, LLC, Highlands Ranch, Colorado.
  •  
  • 13. Kasenow, M.C., 1999, Developing a Distance-Drawdown Graph from a Time-Drawdown Graph, The Professional GEOLOGIST, 36(8), 3-7.
  •  
  • 14. McDonald, M.G. and Harbaugh, A.W., 1988, A modular threedimensional finite-difference groundwater flow model, USGS Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, Book 6, Chapter A1, USGS, Reston, VA, p. 586.
  •  
  • 15. Newsom, J.M. and Wilson, J.L., 1988, Flow of ground water to a well near a stream - Effect of ambient ground-water flow direction, Ground Water, 26(6), 703-711.
  •  
  • 16. Pollock, D.W., 1989, Documentation of computer programs to compute and display pathlines using results from the USGS Modular Three-Dimensional Finite-Difference Groundwater Flow Model, USGS Open File Report 89-381, p. 188.
  •  
  • 17. Rumbaugh, J.O., 1991, Quick Flow: Analytical ground-water flow model, Version 1.0, Geraghty & Miller, Plainview, NY.
  •  
  • 18. Shafer, J.M., 1987a, Reverse pathline calculation of time-related capture zones in nonuniform flow, Ground Water, 25(3), 283-289.
  •  
  • 19. Shafer, J.M., 1987b, GWPATH: Interactive groundwater flow path analysis, Illinois State Water Survey Bulletin 69.
  •  
  • 20. Strack, O.D.L., 1989, Groundwater Mechanics, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, p. 732.
  •  
  • 21. Theis, C.V., 1935, The relation between the lowering of the piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using ground storage, Transaction of the American Geophysical Union, 16, 519-524.
  •  

This Article

  • 2014; 19(3): 1-14

    Published on Jun 30, 2014

  • 10.7857/JSGE.2014.19.3.001
  • Received on Feb 6, 2013
  • Revised on Mar 14, 2014
  • Accepted on Mar 14, 2014