• Applicability of Soil Washing with Neutral Phosphate for Remediation of Arsenic-contaminated Soil at the Former Janghang Smelter Site
  • Im, Jinwoo;Kim, Young-Jin;Yang, Kyung;Nam, Kyoungphile;
  • Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University;Water/Environment Team, Civil Engineering Division, Samsung C&T Corporation;Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University;Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University;
  • (구)장항제련소 주변 부지 매입구역 비소 오염토양에 대한 중성 인산염 토양세척법의 적용가능성 평가
  • 임진우;김영진;양경;남경필;
  • 서울대학교 건설환경공학부;삼성물산주식회사 Civil엔지니어링본부 물/환경팀;서울대학교 건설환경공학부;서울대학교 건설환경공학부;
Abstract
In accordance with the view on remediated soil as a resource, this study assessed the applicability of soil washing with the neutral phosphate for remediation of arsenic (As)-contaminated soil. Three soil samples of different land uses (i.e., rice paddy, upland field and forest land) were collected from the study site, and the aqua regia-extractable As concentrations were 59.2, 30.8 and 53.1 mg/kg, respectively. Among the neutral phosphate reagents, ammonium phosphate showed the highest As washing efficiency. The optimized washing condition was 2-hr washing with 0.5M ammonium phosphate solution (pH 6) and soil to liquid ratio of 1 : 5. The extraction efficiencies of As did not guarantee the residual soil As concentrations to satisfy the Korea soil regulatory level (i.e., Worrisome level) in the three soil samples. To enhance washing efficiency, the As-contaminated soil was submerged in washing solution (1 : 1, w/v) for 24 hr and 1-hr washing with 0.5M ammonium phosphate solution was tested. As extraction efficiencies of 36.1 (rice paddy), 21.4 (upland field) and 26.4% (forest land) were attained, which satisfied the Worrisome level for Region 1 (25 mg/kg of As) in rice paddy, but not in upland field and forest land.

Keywords: Arsenic;Ammonium phosphate;Aqua regia digestion;Soil washing;Soil quality;

References
  • 1. Alam, M.G.M., Tokunaga, S., and Maekawa, T., 2001, Extraction of arsenic in a synthetic arsenic-contaminated soil using phosphate, Chemosphere, 43(8), 1035-1041.
  •  
  • 2. Alam, M.G.M., Tokunaga, S., and Stagnitti, F., 2007, Removal of arsenic from contaminated soils using different salt extractants, J. Environ. Sci. Health, Part A: Toxic/Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng., 42(4), 447-451.
  •  
  • 3. Baek, K., Kim, D.H., Seo, C.I., Yang, J.S., and Lee, J.Y., 2007, Remediation of Pb-contaminated soil by soil washing using hydrochloric acid, J. Soil Groundw. Environ., 12(3), 17-22.
  •  
  • 4. Bohn, H.L., Mcneal, B.L., and O'connor, G.A., 2001, Soil Chemistry, John Wiley & Sons, INC., USA, 213 p.
  •  
  • 5. Dermont, G., Bergeron, M., Mercier, G., and Richer-Lafleche, M., 2008, Soil washing for metal removal: a review of physical/chemical technologies and field applications, J. Hazard. Mater., 152(1), 1-31.
  •  
  • 6. Hongshao, Z. and Stanforth, R., 2001, Competitive adsorption of phosphate and arsenate on goethite, Environ. Sci. Technol., 35(24), 4753-4757.
  •  
  • 7. Jeon, B., Kim, S., Lee, S., and Jung, W., 2008, Technology trends of remediation of arsenic-contaminated soil and groundwater, Min. Hazards Prev. Reclam., 2(1), 3-13.
  •  
  • 8. Jeong, S., An, J., Kim, Y.J., Kim, G., Choi, S.I., and Nam, K., 2011, Study on heavy metal contamination characteristics and plant bioavailability for soils in the Janghang smelter area, J. Soil Groundw. Environ., 16(1), 42-50.
  •  
  • 9. Kim, J.Y., 2011a, Characteristics of thermal desorption (TD) and subcritical water extraction (SWE) for As-contaminated soil, Hanyang University, Seoul, 94-98.
  •  
  • 10. Kim, J.Y., Kim, H.Y., and Kim, S.M., 2011b, Method for Remediating Soil Contaminated by Arsenic using Thermal Desorption and Chemical Washing, KR 10-2011-0049185.
  •  
  • 11. Klute, E.A., 1986, Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods American Society of Agronomy-Soil Science Society of America.
  •  
  • 12. KMOE (Korea Ministry of Environment), 2013a, Official Test Methods of Soil Quality, 2013-113/2000000025462.
  •  
  • 13. KMOE, 2013b, Survey Results on Contamination of Soil in Monitoring Network, 11-1480000-000669-10.
  •  
  • 14. Moon, S.Y., Oh, M.A., Jung, J.K., Choi, S.I., and Lee, J.Y., 2011, Assessment of soil washing efficiency for arsenic contaminated site adjacent to Jang hang refinery, J. Soil Groundw. Environ., 16(1), 71-81.
  •  
  • 15. Park, G.Y., Kim, W.S., Kim, D.H., Yang, J.S., and Baek, K., 2013, Evaluation of electrolyte and electrode spacing for application of electrokinetic remediation, J. Soil Groundw. Environ., 18(1), 6-15.
  •  
  • 16. Seo, S.K., Lee, S.H., Son, J.H., and Chang, Y.Y., 2008, Application of a full scale soil washing process for the remediation of contaminated soil around an abandoned mine, J. Soil Groundw. Environ., 13(2), 70-75.
  •  
  • 17. Sharpley, A., 2006, Agricultural Phosphorus Management: Protecting Production and Water Quality, MidWest Plan Service, USA, 10 p.
  •  
  • 18. Sparks, D.L., 1996, Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3. Chemical Methods American Society of Agronomy-Soil Science Society of America.
  •  
  • 19. Tokunaga, S. and Hakuta, T., 2002, Acid washing and stabilization of an artificial arsenic-contaminated soil, Chemosphere, 46(1), 31-38.
  •  
  • 20. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency), 1996, Microwave Assisted Acid Digestion of Siliceous and Organically Based Matrices, EPA/3052/SW-846.
  •  
  • 21. USEPA, 2002, Arsenic Treatment Technologies for Soil Waste and Water, EPA/542/R/02/004.
  •  
  • 22. Wenzel, W.W., Kirchbaumera, N., Prohaskab, T., Stingeder, G., Lombic, E., and Adrianod, D.C., 2001, Arsenic fractionation in soils using an improved sequential extraction procedure, Anal. Chim. Acta, 436, 309-323.
  •  
  • 23. Yang, J.S., Hwang, J.M., Baek, K., and Kwon, M.J., 2013a, Soil washing and effluent treatment for contaminated soil with toxic metals, Korean Chem. Eng. Res., 51(6), 745-754.
  •  
  • 24. Yang, K., Jeong, S., Im, J., and Nam, K., 2013b, Incorporation of arsenic form and bioaccessibility into risk assessment and remedial decision in the As-contaminated formersmelting activity impacted soil, Proceedings of 2013 International Symposium and Asian Network on Soil and Groundwater Environment, Korean Soc. Soil Groundw. Environ., Jeju, p. 16-17.
  •  
  • 25. Yi, Y.M., Oh, C.T., Kim, G.J., Lee, C.H., and Sung, K.J., 2012, Changes in the physicochemical properties of soil according to soil remediation methods, J. Soil Groundw. Environ., 17(4), 36-43.
  •  
  • 26. Yi, Y.M., Kim, G.J., and Sung, K.J., 2013, Effects of soil remediation methods on the biological properties of soils, J. Soil Groundw. Environ., 18(3), 73-81.
  •  

This Article

  • 2014; 19(4): 45-51

    Published on Aug 31, 2014

  • 10.7857/JSGE.2014.19.4.045
  • Received on Apr 14, 2014
  • Revised on Jun 10, 2014
  • Accepted on Jun 10, 2014