• Determination of Human Health Risk Incorporated with Arsenic Bioaccessibility and Remediation Goals at the Former Janghang Smelter Site
  • Yang, Kyung;Kim, Young-Jin;Im, Jinwoo;Nam, Kyoungphile;
  • Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University;Water/Environment Team, Civil Engineering Division, Samsung C&T Corporation;Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University;Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University;
  • (구)장항제련소 매입구역의 비소 오염도와 생물학적접근성을 반영한 위해성평가 및 정화수준 결정에 관한 연구
  • 양경;김영진;임진우;남경필;
  • 서울대학교 건설환경공학부;삼성물산주식회사 Civil 엔지니어링본부 물/환경팀;서울대학교 건설환경공학부;서울대학교 건설환경공학부;
Abstract
Metal concentrations in the former Janghang smelter area were determined and human health risk of arsenic (As) with bioaccessibility was investigated. Site investigation of the area within 1.5 km from the Janghang smelter showed the As concentrations of 4.8~169.8 mg/kg (avg. 37.8 mg/kg). For 85 samples out of 126 samples, As concentrations were higher than the Worrisome Level of the Korean Soil and Environment Conservation Act, and seven samples exceeded the Countermeasure Standard. Risk assessment for As incorporated with the bioaccessibility revealed that potential human health risk of the carcinogenic ($1.8{\sim}5.0{\times}10^{-5}$) was above the acceptable risk range ($10^{-5}{\sim}10^{-6}$) while the risk of the non-carcinogenic was not found. Remediation goals based on risk incorporated with bioaccessibility of As ranged from 10.8 to 20.0 mg/kg. Such difference in the remediation goals resulted from various bioaccessibility of As (i.e., between 8.7~66.3%) at the study site.

Keywords: Former Janghang smelter;Arsenic;Bioaccessibility;Risk assessment;

References
  • 1. Adriano, D.C., 2001, Trace Elements in the Terrestrial Environment, 2nd ed, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, USA, 255 p.
  •  
  • 2. ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances & Disease Registry), 2014, Priority List of Hazardous Substances, available at http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/spl/.
  •  
  • 3. Basta, N.T., Foster, J.N., Dayton, E.A., Rodriguez, R.R., and Casteel, S.W., 2007, The effect of dosing vehicle on arsenic bioaccessibility in smelter-contaminated soils, J. Environ. Sci. Health, Part A, 42(9), 1275-1281.
  •  
  • 4. Bradham, K.D., Scheckel, K.G., Nelson, C.M., Seales, P.E., Lee, G.E., Hughes, M.F., Miller, B.W., Yeow, A., Gilmore, T., Serda, S.M., Harper, S., and Thomas, D.J., 2011, Relative bioavailability and bioaccessibility and speciation of arsenic in contaminated soils, Environ. Health Perspect., 119(11), 1629-1634.
  •  
  • 5. Brattin, W., Drexler, J., Lowney, Y., Griffin, S., Diamond, G., and Woodbury, L., 2013, An in vitro method for estimation of arsenic relative bioavailability in soil, J. Toxicol. Environ. Health, Part A, 76(7), 458-478.
  •  
  • 6. Dermont, G., Bergeron, M., Mercier, G., and Richer-Laflche, M., 2008, Soil washing for metal removal: A review of physical/chemical technologies and field applications, J. Hazard. Mater., 152(1), 1-31.
  •  
  • 7. Juhasz, A.L., Weber, J., Smith, E., Naidu, R., Rees, M., Rofe, A., Kuchel, T., and Sansom, L., 2009, Assessment of four commonly employed in vitro arsenic bioaccessibility assays for predicting in vivo relative arsenic bioavailability in contaminated Soils, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43(24), 9487-9494.
  •  
  • 8. KECO (Korea Environment Corporation), 2008, Detailed Soil Servey Report for Former Janahang Smelter Area.
  •  
  • 9. Kelley, M.E., Brauning, S., Schoof, R., and Ruby, M., 2002, Assessing Oral Bioavailability of Metals in Soil, Battelle Press, Columbus, OH, USA, 75-85 p.
  •  
  • 10. KMOE (Korea Ministry of Environment), 2009, Official Test Methods of Soil Quality, 2009-255.
  •  
  • 11. KMOE, 2010, Detailed Soil Survey Guidance, 2010-104.
  •  
  • 12. KMOE, 2011, Soil Contaminant Risk Assessment Guidance, 2011-139.
  •  
  • 13. Rodriguez, R.R., Basta, N.T., Casteel, S.W., and Pace, L.W., 1999, An in vitro gastrointestinal method to estimate bioavailable arsenic in contaminated soils and solid media, Environ. Sci. Technol., 33(4), 642-649.
  •  
  • 14. Ruby, M.V., Davis, A., Schoof, R., Eberle, S., and Sellstone, C.M., 1996, Estimation of lead and arsenic bioavailability using a Physiologically Based Extraction Test, Environ. Sci. Technol., 30(2), 422-430.
  •  
  • 15. USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency), 1989, Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS), Volume I: Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part A), Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Washington, DC, USA, EPA/540/1-89/002.
  •  
  • 16. USEPA, 1992, Guidelines for Exposure Assessment, Risk Assessment Forum, Washington, DC, USA, EPA/600/Z-92/001.
  •  
  • 17. USEPA, 2004, Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS), Volume I: Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part E, Supplemental Guidance for Dermal Risk Assessment), Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation, Washington, DC, USA, EPA/540/R/99/005.
  •  
  • 18. USEPA, 2007, Guidance for Evaluating the Oral Bioavailability of Metals in Soils for Use in Human Health Risk Assessment, Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation, Washington, DC, USA, OSWER 9285.7-80.
  •  
  • 19. USEPA, 2011, ProUCL 4.1 software, available at http://www.epa.gov/osp/hstl/tsc/software.htm.
  •  
  • 20. USEPA, 2012a, Compilation and Review of Data on Relative Bioavailability of Arsenic in Soil, Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation, Washington, DC, USA, OSWER 9200.1-113.
  •  
  • 21. USEPA, 2012b, Recommendations for Default Value for Relative Bioavailability of Arsenic in Soil, Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation, Washington, DC, USA, OSWER 9200.1-113.
  •  
  • 22. USEPA, 2014, Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS), available at http://www.epa.gov/iris/.
  •  
  • 23. USEPA Region 8, 2012, Standard Operating Procedure, In Vitro Bioacessibility (IVBA) Procedure for Arsenic.
  •  
  • 24. WHO (World Health Organization), 2014, Agents Classified by the IARC Monographs, available at http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/.
  •  

This Article

  • 2014; 19(4): 52-61

    Published on Aug 31, 2014

  • 10.7857/JSGE.2014.19.4.052
  • Received on Apr 15, 2014
  • Revised on Jun 27, 2014
  • Accepted on Jun 30, 2014