• Application of TREECS Program to Predict the Fate of TNT and RDX from Firing Range
  • Yu, Gihyeon;Jung, Jae-Woong;Nam, Kyoungphile;
  • Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, Seoul National University;National Instrumentation Center for Environmental Management, College of Agriculture and Life Science, Seoul National University;Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, Seoul National University;
  • TREECS 프로그램을 이용한 화약류 오염 군 사격장 토양의 TNT와 RDX 유출 특성 연구
  • 유기현;정재웅;남경필;
  • 서울대학교 공과대학 건설환경공학부;서울대학교 농생명과학대학 농생명과학공동기기원;서울대학교 공과대학 건설환경공학부;
Abstract
Attention to munitions constituents such as 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT) and hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX) in the firing ranges is increasing due to their toxicity and high mobility to the environment. It is helpful to use a systemic model to predict the amount of contaminants for the establishment of environmental management of firing ranges. This study employed Training Range Environmental Evaluation and Characterization System (TREECS) program to estimate the mobility characteristics of TNT and RDX via groundwater leaching, soil erosion and surface water runoff. The prediction results of the TNT and RDX migration with TREECS showed that 68% of initial TNT and 21% of initial RDX were discharged through the soil erosion and the 20% of initial TNT and 54% of initial RDX ran out the firing range via the groundwater leaching. The rest of the initial TNT and RDX moved to adjacent surface water via surface runoff. The data suggest that soil erosion and surface runoff occupying 80% of TNT to the total amount are important migration pathways. On the other hand, groundwater leachning occupying 54% to the total amount was also important pathway for RDX.

Keywords: Firing range;TNT;RDX;TREECS;

References
  • 1. Bae, B. and Park, J., 2014, Distribution and migration characteristics of explosive compounds in soil at military shooting ranges in Gyeonggi Province, J. Kor. Geo-Environ. Soc., 15(6), 17-29.
  •  
  • 2. Cao, X., Ma, L.Q., Chen, M., Hardison, Jr., D.W., and Harris, W.G., 2003, Weathering of lead bullets and their environmental effects at outdoor shooting ranges, J. Environ. Qual., 32, 526-534.
  •  
  • 3. Dortch, M.S., Gerald, J.A., and Johnson, B.E., 2009, Methods for Tier 1 modeling within the training range environmental evaluation and characterization system, available at. http://el.erdc.usace.army.mil/elpubs/pdf/trel09-11.pdf.
  •  
  • 4. Gong, H.Y., Lee, K.P., Lee, J.Y., Kim, B., Lee, A., Bae, B., and Kim, J.Y., 2012, Assessment of soil loss at military shooting range by RUSLE model: correlation between soil loss and migration of explosive compounds, J. Soil Ground. Environ., 17(6), 119-128.
  •  
  • 5. Jung, J.W., 2014, Risk management of TNT/heavy metals in active firing ranges by mobility control using MKP/bentonite, Ph.D dissertation, Seoul national university.
  •  
  • 6. Johnson, B.E. and Dortch, M.S., 2014, Application of TREECS modeling system to Strontium-90 for Borschi Watershed near Chernobyl, Ukraine, J. Environ. Radioact., 131, 31-39.
  •  
  • 7. KMOE, 2005, The Development of Hybrid Electrokinetic Remediation Technique Using Solar Energy on Shooting Range Soils Contaminated by Heavy Metals.
  •  
  • 8. Pennington, J.C., Gunnison, D., Harrelson, D.W., Brannon, J. M., Zakikhani, M., Jenkins, T.F., Clarke, J.U., Hayes, C.A., Myers, T., and Perkins, E., 1999, Natural Attenuation of Explosives in Soil and Water Systems at Department of Defense Sites: Interim report, Technical Report EL-99-8, U.S.; Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station: Vicksburg, MS.
  •  
  • 9. USEPA, 1988, Superfund Exposure Assessment manual, EPA/540/1-881001, Available at http://rais.ornl.gov/documents/Exposure_Assessment_ Manual_1988_EPA5401881001.pdf
  •  
  • 10. USEPA, 2012, 2012 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories, EPA 822-R-09-011. Office of Water, Washington, DC, USA.
  •  
  • 11. Walkley, A. and Black, I.A., 1934, An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method, Soil Sci., 37(1), 29-38.
  •  

This Article

  • 2015; 20(6): 133-139

    Published on Nov 30, 2015

  • 10.7857/JSGE.2015.20.6.133
  • Received on Oct 8, 2015
  • Revised on Nov 11, 2015
  • Accepted on Nov 28, 2015