• The Priority Management Ranking by using the Classification of Vulnerable Areas for the Soil Contamination in Busan Metropolitan City
  • Jung, Hyunjung;Lee, Minhee;Doe, Jinwoo;
  • Geo-Sciences Institute, Pukyong National University;Department of Earth Environmental Sciences, Pukyong National University;Korea Petroleum Quality & Distribution Authority/Research Institute of Petroleum Technology;
  • 부산시 토양오염 취약지역 등급화를 이용한 우선관리대상 순위 선정
  • 정현정;이민희;도진우;
  • 부경대학교 지구과학연구소;부경대학교 지구환경과학과;한국석유관리원 석유기술연구소;
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to highlight the National Classification System related to cleanup the soil contaminated sites and to provide some guidance to address the priority management rank system before the remediation for Busan metropolitan city. Based on the previous soil investigation data, the quantitative classification of vulnerable areas for soil pollution was performed to successfully manage the contaminated sites in Busan. Ten evaluation factors indicating the high soil pollution possibility were used for the priority management ranking system and 10 point was assigned for each factor which was evenly divided by 10 class intervals. For 16 Gu/Guns in Busan, the score of each evaluation factor was assigned according to the ratio of the area (or the number) between in each Gu (or Gun) and in Busan. Ten scores for each Gu (or Gun) was summed up to prioritize the vulnerable Gu or Guns for soil pollution in Busan. Results will be available to determine the most urgent area to cleanup in each Gu (or Gun) and also to assist the municipal government to design a successful and cost-effective site management strategy in Busan.

Keywords: Evaluation factor;Priority management;Ranking system;Soil pollution;

References
  • 1. BIHE (Busan Institute of Health and Environment), 2013, Investigation of soil pollution around Busan area in 2013, Annual Report, Department of Soil and Hazardous waste, Busan Metropolitan City.
  •  
  • 2. BMC (Busan Metropolitan City), 2014, The master plan for soil conservation in Busan metropolitan city (2015-2024), Final Report, Korea.
  •  
  • 3. CCME (Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment), 2008, National classification system for contaminated Sites (Guidance document), ISBN 978-1-896997-80-3, Final Report, Canada.
  •  
  • 4. KEI (Korea Environment Institute), 2003, Program of the maintenance and the remediation for soil contaminated sites, Final Report, Ministry of Environment, Korea.
  •  
  • 5. KEI (Korea Environment Institute), 2005, How to prepare the cleanup costs for soil contaminated sites in Korea?, Final Report, Ministry of Environment, Korea.
  •  
  • 6. Lee, M., 2010, Study on the Evaluation Standards for the Ranking of the Precise Investigation to Asbestos-Contaminated Abandoned Mines, Korea, Econ. Environ. Geol., 43(4), 393-400.
  •  
  • 7. MOE (Ministry of Environment), 2006a, Evaluation of the remediation ranking system in the report "Soil pollution state for abandoned heavy metal mines" Final Report, Korea.
  •  
  • 8. MOE (Ministry of Environment), 2006b, Guidance for soil risk assessment, MOE regulation 283, Final Report, Korea.
  •  
  • 9. MOE (Ministry of Environment), 2007, General soil investigation for abandoned heavy metal mines in Korea, Annual Report. Ministry of Environment, Korea.
  •  
  • 10. MOE (Ministry of Environment), 2009, The master plan for soil conservation in Korea, Final Report. Ministry of Environment, Korea.
  •  
  • 11. MOE (Ministry of Environment), 2012, Assessment of soil and groundwater pollution for industrial complex in Korea, Annual Report. Ministry of Environment, Korea.
  •  
  • 12. NIER (National Institute of Environmental Research), 2012, A fact-finding survey of pesticide usage for domestic golf course in 2012, In: SGIS (Soil and Groundwater Information System), Annual Report, Ministry of Environment, Korea.
  •  
  • 13. SMAC (Sejong Metropolitan Autonomous City), 2014, The master plan for soil conservation in Sejong Metropolitan Autonomous City (2014-2023), Final Report, Korea.
  •  
  • 14. SMG (Seoul Metropolitan Government), 2011, The master plan for soil conservation in Seoul metropolitan city (2011-2020), Final Report. Korea.
  •  
  • 15. USEPA, 1991 Guidance for performing preliminary assessments under CERCLA, EPA/540/G-91/013, Final Report, USA.
  •  
  • 16. USEPA, 1992a, Hazard ranking system guidance manual, EPA/540-R-92-026, Final Report, USA.
  •  
  • 17. USEPA, 1992b, Guidance for performing site inspections under CERCLA, EPA/540-R-92-021, Final Report, USA.
  •  
  • 18. van den Berg, R., 1993, Human exposure to contaminated soil: a model (CSOIL) used for the assessment of human-toxicological intervention values for soil clean-up, In: F. Arendt, G.J. Annokkee, R. Bosman, W.J. van den Brink (eds.): Contaminated Soil, Dordrecht, Boston, London, p. 481-482.
  •  
  • 19. van Sandick, O.Z. and Keuzenkamp, K.W., 1994, Policy and legal framework regarding contaminated sites in the Netherlands, In: Vortrag vor dem International Workshop “Contaminated sites in the European Union: Policies and strategies”, Bonn, p. 8-9.
  •  

This Article

  • 2015; 20(7): 1-12

    Published on Dec 31, 2015

  • 10.7857/JSGE.2015.20.7.001
  • Received on Sep 15, 2015
  • Revised on Oct 15, 2015
  • Accepted on Dec 4, 2015