• Reviewing the Applications of Three Countries' Ground Water Flow Modeling Regulatory Guidelines to Nuclear Facilities in Korea
  • Lee, Chung-Mo;Hamm, Se-Yeong;Hyun, Seung Gyu;Cheong, Jae-Yeol;Wei, Ming Liang;
  • Department of Geological Sciences, Pusan National University;Department of Geological Sciences, Pusan National University;Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety;R&D Institute, Korea Radioactive Waste Agency;Department of Geological Sciences, Pusan National University;
Abstract
The numerical analysis of groundwater flow is indispensable for predicting problems associated with water resource development, civil works, environmental hazards, and nuclear power plant construction. Korea lacks public regulatory procedures and guidelines for groundwater flow modeling, especially in nuclear facility sites, which makes adequate evaluation difficult. Feasible step-by-step guidelines are also unavailable. Consequently, reports on groundwater flow modeling have low-grade quality and often present controversial opinions. Additionally, without public guidelines, maintaining consistency in reviewing reports and enforcing laws is more challenging. In this study, the guidelines for groundwater flow modeling were reviewed for three countries - the United States (Documenting Groundwater Modeling at Sites Contaminated with Radioactive Substances), Canada (Guidelines for Groundwater Modelling to Assess Impacts of Proposed Natural Resource Development Activities), and Australia (Australian Groundwater Modelling Guidelines), with the aim of developing groundwater flow modeling regulatory guidelines that can be applied to nuclear facilities in Korea, in accordance with the Groundwater Act, Environmental Impact Assessment Act, and the Nuclear Safety Act.

Keywords: Groundwater modeling;Regulatory guidelines;Nuclear facility;Modeling process;

References
  • 1. American Nuclear Society, 1980, Evaluation of Radionuclide Transport in Groundwater for Nuclear Power Sites, ANSI/ANS-2.17-1980, American Nuclear Society, 29p.
  •  
  • 2. ASTM D-5447, 2004, Standard Guide for Application of a Ground-Water Flow Model to a Site-Specific Problem, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 7p.
  •  
  • 3. ASTM D-5490, 1993, Standard Guide for Comparing Ground-Water Flow Model Simulations to Site-Specific Information, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 9p.
  •  
  • 4. ASTM D-5609, 1994, Standard Guide for Defining Boundary Conditions in Ground-Water Modeling, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 4p.
  •  
  • 5. ASTM D-5610, 1994, Standard Guide for Defining Initial Conditions in Ground-Water Modeling, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2p.
  •  
  • 6. ASTM D-5611, 1994, Standard Guide for Conducting a Sensitivity Analysis for a Ground-Water Flow Model Application, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 6p.
  •  
  • 7. ASTM D-5718, 1994, Standard Guide for Documenting a Ground-Water Flow Model Application, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 5p.
  •  
  • 8. ASTM D-5719, 1995, Standard Guide for Simulating Subsurface Air Flow using Ground-Water Flow Modeling Techniques, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 5p.
  •  
  • 9. Barnett, B., Townley, L.R., Post, V., Evans, R.E., Hunt, R.J., Peeters, L., Richardson, S., Werner, A.D., Knapton, A., and Boronkay, A., 2012, Australian Groundwater Modelling Guidelines, Waterlines Report Series, No. 82., National Water Commission, Canberra, 191p.
  •  
  • 10. British Columbia Ministry of Environment, 2012, Guidelines for Groundwater Modelling to Assess Impacts of Proposed Natural Resource Development Activities, Report No. 194001, BC MOE Protection & Sustainability Branch, Robertson GeoConsultants Inc. & SRK Consulting Inc. Canada, 385p.
  •  
  • 11. Federal Register of Legislation, 2004, National Water Commission Act 2004, Series: C2004A01391, Act No. 156 of 2004.
  •  
  • 12. Kumar, C.P., 2012, Groundwater Modelling Software - Capabilities and Limitations, J. Environ Sci. Toxicol. Food Technol., 1(2), 46-57.
  •  
  • 13. Ministry of Environment, 2015, Chapter 1 General Article 2 (Definitions), Ministry of Environment Notice No. 13040.
  •  
  • 14. Minister of Justice, 2012, Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 70p.
  •  
  • 15. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, 2011a, Groundwater Act, Chapter 1 General Article 2 (Definitions), Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport No. 13383.
  •  
  • 16. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, 2011b, Groundwater Act, Chapter 1 General Article 7 (Permission to develop and use groundwater), Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport No. 13383.
  •  
  • 17. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, 2011c, Groundwater Act, Chapter 1 General Article 13 (Restrictions on activities in groundwater conservation areas), Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport No. 13383.
  •  
  • 18. Murray-Darling Basin Commission, 2001, Groundwater Flow Modelling Guideline, Project No. 125., Aquaterra Consulting Pty Ltd., Western Australia, 133p.
  •  
  • 19. National Archives and Records Administration, 2016a, Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Protection of Environment, Pt. 126-149, Revised as of July 1, 2016, Office of the federal register, 1050p.
  •  
  • 20. National Archives and Records Administration, 2016b, Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Energy, Pt. 1-50, Revised as of January 1, 2016, Office of the federal register, 1096p.
  •  
  • 21. National Archives and Records Administration, 2016c, Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Energy, Pt. 51-199, Revised as of January 1, 2016, Office of the federal register, 1050p.
  •  
  • 22. Nuclear Safety and Security Commission, 2014a, Regulations on technical standards such as reactor facilities, Chapter 2 Technical standard for reactor facilities Article 7 (Hydrology and Oceanographic Conditions), Notice 2014-062.
  •  
  • 23. Nuclear Safety and Security Commission, 2014b, Regulations on technical standards such as reactor facilities, Chapter 2 Technical standard for reactor facilities Article 65 (Location of Shallow Disposal Facility), Notice 2014-062.
  •  
  • 24. Nuclear Safety and Security Commission, 2014c, Regulations on technical standards such as reactor facilities, Chapter 2 Technical standard for reactor facilities Article 66 (Location of Deep Disposal Facility), Notice 2014-062.
  •  
  • 25. Nuclear Safety and Security Commission, 2014d, Regulations on the preparation of radiation environmental impact assessment reports for nuclear facility, Notice 2014-011.
  •  
  • 26. U.S. EPA, 1993a, Computer Models Used to Support Cleanup Decision-Making at Hazardous and Radioactive Waste Sites, EPA 402-R-92-005., U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
  •  
  • 27. U.S. EPA, 1993b, Environmental Characteristics of EPA, NRC, and DOE Sites Contaminated with Radioactive Substances, EPA 402-R-93-011., U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
  •  
  • 28. U.S. EPA, 1994, A Technical Guide to Ground Water Model Selection at Sites Contaminated with Radioactive Substances, EPA 402-R-94-012., U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
  •  
  • 29. U.S. EPA, 1996a, Documenting Groundwater Modeling at Sites Contaminated with Radioactive Substances, EPA 540-R-96-003., U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
  •  
  • 30. U.S. EPA, 1996b, Environmental Pathway Models-Ground Water Modeling in Support of Remedial Decision-Making at Sites Contaminated with Radioactive Material, EPA/540/F.94-024., U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
  •  
  • 31. U.S. EPA, 1997, Guiding Principles for Monte Carlo Analysis. EPA/630/R-97/001., U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
  •  
  • 32. Yan, W., Alcoe, D., Morgan, L., Li, C., and Howles, S., 2010, Protocol for development of numerical groundwater model, version 1, The Government of South Australia, Department for Water.
  •  

This Article