• Groundwater Polices of the USA and Their Implications to Groundwater Management in Korea -Examples of California and Texas States-
  • Lee, Byung Sun;Song, Sung-Ho;Kim, Wonsuck;
  • Rural Research Institute, Korea Rural Community Corporation;Rural Research Institute, Korea Rural Community Corporation;Department of Geological Sciences, University of Texas at Austin;
  • 미국의 지하수 제도와 국내 지하수 관리에의 시사점 -캘리포니아 및 텍사스 주를 중심으로-
  • 이병선;송성호;김원석;
  • 한국농어촌공사 농어촌연구원;한국농어촌공사 농어촌연구원;텍사스주립대학교 지질학과;
Abstract
This study reviewed the groundwater policies of USA as a benchmarking for the purpose of improving groundwater polices, regulations, and plans in Korea. Each state of the USA has its own unique groundwater policies. Recently, severe drought in the western parts of the USA resulted in the launch of the California Statewide Groundwater Elevation Monitoring (CASGEM) program. CASGEM classified a total of 515 alluvial groundwater basins of the California State to four prior groups (high, medium, low, and very low prioritization). In Texas, a total of 101 Groundwater Conservation Districts (GCDs) over the state has controlled groundwater pumping amounts in their own management areas and 16 Groundwater Management Areas (GMAs) over the state have directly managed groundwater aquifer. Direct management for aquifers by GMAs would be the most scientific method for groundwater management, which expected to provide water consumers the more advavnced groundwater service. These groundwater management strategies of the USA can be possibly considered in groundwater plans for national and local governmental authorities, which possibly results in more optimal groundwater management in Korea.

Keywords: Groundwater;Management;Policy;USA;Korea;

References
  • 1. Airhart, M., 2012, Groundwater depletion in semiarid regions of texas and california threatens U.S. food security, https://news.utexas.edu/2012/05/29/groundwater [accessed 16.11.15]
  •  
  • 2. Baxtresser, D., 2010, Antiques Roadshow: The common law and the coming age of groundwater marketing, Michigan Law Review, 108(5), 773-794.
  •  
  • 3. CWS, 2012, Addressing nitrate in California's drinking water with a focus on Tulare lake basin and saline valley groundwater: Report for the state water resources control board report to the legislature, CWS (Center for Watershed Sciences), Univ. of California at Davis, p. 78.
  •  
  • 4. Dupnik, J.T., 2012, A Policy proposal for regional aquifer-scale management of groundwater in Texas, Master thesis, Univ. of Texas at Austin, p. 176.
  •  
  • 5. DWR, 2014, California groundwater elevation monitoring: Basin prioritization process, DWR (Department of water resource), State of California, p. 28.
  •  
  • 6. Hardberger, A., 2013, Texas courts start to fill in the blanks on groundwater law, http://texaslivingwaters.org/texas-courts-start-fill-blanks-groundwater-law [accessed 16.11.15]
  •  
  • 7. Joshi, S.R., 2005, Comparison of groundwater rights in the United States: Lessons for Texas, Master thesis, Texas Tech Univ., p. 122.
  •  
  • 8. Jung, C.D., Kim, Y.B., Park, K.Y., and Park, S.J., 2012, Efficient management method of groundwater in farming and fishing villages, J. Soil Groundw. Environ., 17(4), 81-90.
  •  
  • 9. MAFRA and KRC, 2016, An annual report on the Rural Groundwater Management Network, MAFRA (Ministry of agriculture, food, and rural affairs) and KRC (Korea rural community corporation).
  •  
  • 10. MOLIT and K-water, 2016, Water and future: Proceedings on 2016 world water day, MOLIT (Ministry of land, infrastrucre, and transport) and K-water, Busan, Korea, p. 402.
  •  
  • 11. RCGCD, 2014, Where does our water come from and where is it used?, RCGCD (Rusk County Groundwater Conservation District), http://rcgcd.org/question3.html [accessed 16.11.15]
  •  
  • 12. Sahs, M.K., 2009, Essentials of Texas water resources, State bar of Texas.
  •  
  • 13. TWDB, 2004, 100 Years of rule of capture: From east to groundwater management, TWDB (Texas water development board).
  •  
  • 14. TWDB, 2011, Aquifers of Texas, TWDB (Texas water development board).
  •  
  • 15. USDA, 2012, Which are the top 10 agricultural producing states?, USDA (United States Department of Agriculture), https://www.ers.usda.gov/faqs.aspx#Q1 [accessed 16.11.15]
  •  
  • 16. USGS, 2009, Groundwater availability of the central valley aquifer, California, USGS (U.S. geological survey).
  •  
  • 17. USGS, 2014, Estimated use of water in the United States in 2010, USGS (U.S. Geological Survey).
  •  
  • 18. Walker, L., 2010, CV SALTS; Salt and nitrate sources pilot implementation study report, First report, Larry Walker associates.
  •  
  • 19. Walton B., 2014, California, Texas, and the southwestern U.S. face a critical year for water supplies: 2014 preview, Part I, http://www.circleofblue.org/2014/world/2014-preview-california-texas-southwest-face-critical-year-water-supplies [accessed 16.11.15]
  •  

This Article