• Effect of Soil Grinding on Total Concentrations of As and Pb in Soil Determined by aqua regia Method
  • An, Jinsung;Yu, Gihyeon;Nam, Kyoungphile;
  • Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University;Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University;Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University;
  • 토양시료의 분쇄가 왕수분해법을 이용한 비소와 납의 전함량 분석 결과에 미치는 영향
  • 안진성;유기현;남경필;
  • 서울대학교 건설환경공학부;서울대학교 건설환경공학부;서울대학교 건설환경공학부;
Abstract
The effect of soil grinding on total As and Pb concentrations determined by aqua regia method was examined. Among six field-collected, air-dried soil samples tested, soils A, B, C, and E were directly sieved through a $150-{\mu}m$ sieve without grinding and showed 2.18 to 3.03 times higher total As concentrations and 2.62 to 3.45 times higher total Pb concentrations than those of the soil samples prepared to allow all soil particles to pass through the $150-{\mu}m$ sieve by grinding. The reason can be ascribed to the fact that those soils contain fine particles (i.e., < $150{\mu}m$ in diameter) only 4.6 to 6.8% of the total soil weights. On the other hand, for D and F soils, fine particles smaller than $150{\mu}m$ accounted for 57 and 46%, respectively, so that the effect of grinding on As and Pb concentrations were relatively low (As: 1.15 and 1.23 times, Pb: 1.36 and 1.49 times, respectively). The result demonstrates that grinding prior to $150-{\mu}m$ sieving is necessary to ensure the homogeneity of soil samples and hence to obtain more accurate heavy metal concentrations in soils. This is especially true for soil samples with less fine soil particles and/or microaggregates (i.e., below $150{\mu}m$).

Keywords: Grinding;Sieving;Aggregate;Heavy metal;Aqua regia digestion;

References
  • 1. Acosta, J.A., Cano, A.F., Arocena, J.M., Debela, F., and Martinez-Martinez, S., 2009, Distribution of metals in soil particle size fractions and its implication to risk assessment of playgrounds in Murcia City (Spain), Geoderma, 149(1-2), 101-109.
  •  
  • 2. Beamer, P.I., Elish, C.A., Roe, D.J., Loh, M., and Layton, D.W., 2012, Differences in metal concentration by particle size in house dust and soil, J. Environ. Monit., 14, 839-844.
  •  
  • 3. Brady, L.C. and Weil, R.R., 2010, Elements of the Nature and Properties of Soils, 3rd edition, Prentice Hall.
  •  
  • 4. Chen, Ming, and Ma, L.Q., 2001, Comparison of three aqua regia digestion methods for twenty Florida soils, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 65, 491-499.
  •  
  • 5. Jastre, J., Sahuquillo, A., Vidal, M., and Rauret, G., 2002, Determination of Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn in environmental samples: microwave-assisted total digestion versus aqua regia and nitric acid extraction, Anal. Chim. Acta, 462, 59-72.
  •  
  • 6. KMOE (Korea Ministry of Environment), 2017, Official Test Methods of Soil Quality, 2017-22.
  •  
  • 7. Ljung, K., Selinus, O., Otabbong, E., and Berglund, M., 2006, Metal and arsenic distribution in soil particle sizes relevant to soil ingestion by children, Appl. Geochem., 21, 1613-1624.
  •  
  • 8. Luo, X.-S., Yu, S., and Li, X.-D., 2011, Distribution, availability, and sources of trace metals in different particle size fractions of urban soils in Hong Kong: Implications for assessing the risk to human health, Environ. Pollut., 159, 1317-1326.
  •  
  • 9. USEPA, 1996, Method 3052: Microwave assisted acid digestion of siliceous and organically based matrices, EPA/3052/SW-846.
  •  
  • 10. Wang, X., Qin, Y., and Chen, Y., 2006, Heavy metals in urban roadside soils, Part 1: effect of particle size fractions on heavy metals partitioning, Environ. Geol., 50, 1061-1066.
  •  

This Article