• Study on the Contamination Characteristics of Pollutants at Various type of Abandoned Metal Mines
  • Lee, Jong-Deuk;Kim, Tae Dong;Kim, Sun Gu;Kim, Hee-Joung;
  • Department of Enviromental Engineering, Andong National University;Department of Enviromental Engineering, Andong National University;Institute for Occup. & Envi. Health, Korea University;Division of Environmental Research Center, Kangwon National University;
  • 폐금속 광산의 유형별 오염특성에 관한 연구
  • 이종득;김태동;김선구;김휘중;
  • 안동대학교 환경공학과;안동대학교 환경공학과;고려대학교 환경의학연구소;강원대학교 환경연구소;
Abstract
This study is aimed to prepare the effective detail survey methods(Phase II) of abandoned metal mines through the contamination assessment for mine types and facilities in the abandoned metal mine areas. The study sites of 12 abandoned mines are located in Gyeonggi-do and Gangwon-do and those were chosen among 310 sites that the Phase II survey was conducted from 2007 to 2009 after considering the results of Phase I for abandoned mines scattered all over the country. 12 study sites were classified into four types; Type I sites only have pit mouth. Type II sites have pit mouth and mine-waste field. Type III sites have pit mouth and tailing sorting field. Type IV sites have pit mouth, tailing sorting field and concentrator(s). In forest land, paddy soil and farm land of Type I, As and Cd were showed average concentration, and Cu and Pb were high on the pit mouth area in one mines where the pit mouth was developed within 500 m. In the mines of Type II, Cu and Pb were showed average concentration too, but As and Cd were slightly high in pit mouth and mine-waste field. The mines of Type III which had grinding particle process through physical separation milling or hitting showed similar tendency with Type II. However, mines of Type IV pit mouth, mine-waste field and showed various results depending on defining the contamination sources. For example, if contamination source was pit mouth, the mixed results of Type I, II, II were showed. In tailing sorting field which was regarded as the most important source and having high mobility, however, if there were no facilities or it was difficult to access directly, field sampling was missed occasionally during phase I and phase II survey. For that reason, the assessment for tailing sorting field is missed and it leads to completely different results. In the areas of Type I mines, the concentration of heavy metals exceeded precautionary standards of soil contamination or not within 1,000 meters of pit mouth. Nickel(Ni) was the largest factor of the heavy metal contamination in this type. The heavy metals except Arsenic(As) were shown high levels of concentration in Type II areas, where pit mouth and mine-waste field were operated for making powder in upriver region; therefore, to the areas in the vicinity of midstream and downstream, the high content of heavy metals were shown. The tendency of high level of heavy metals and toxic materials contained in flotation agent used during sorting process were found in soil around sorting and tailing field. In the abandoned-pit-mouth area, drygrinding area and tailing sorting field area, the content of Cupper(Cu) and Zinc(Zn) were higher than other areas. Also, the contaminated area were larger than mine reclamation area(2,000 m) and the location of tailing sorting field was one of the important factors to estimate contaminated area.

Keywords: Abandoned metal mine;Tailing;Pit mouth area;Mine-waste field;Tailing sorting field;

References
  • 1. Bear, F.E., 1964, Chemistry of the Soil. Second Edition. Rein-hold Publishing Corporation.
  •  
  • 2. Bowen, H.J.M., 1979, Environmental Chemistry of the Elements, Academic Press, New York, 333 p.
  •  
  • 3. Forster, U. and Wittmann, T.G., 1981, Metal pollution in the aquatic environment[M]. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  •  
  • 4. Istvan, P. and Benton, J.J. Jr., 1997, The Handbook of Trace Elements, 2rd, CRC Press, Washington D.C., p. 240.
  •  
  • 5. Kim, H.J., Yang, J., and Lee, J.-Y., 2003, Fraction and Soil Pollution Assesment Index of heavy metals in cultivated land soils near the abandoned mine. J. Soil &Ground water Env., 8(4), 53-63.
  •  
  • 6. Kim, H.J., Yang, J., and Lee, J.-Y., and Sang, H.J., 2006, Leaching Characteristics of Heavy Metals from Abandoned Mines wastes in the Namhan River Shore, Korean Society of Soil and Ground Water Environment, Annual Meetings, p. 201-207.
  •  
  • 7. Kloke, A., 1979, Content of arsenic, cadmium, chromium, fluorine, lead, mercury, nickel in plants grown on contaminated soil: UN-ECE Symp.
  •  
  • 8. Levinsion, A.A., 1974, Introduction to exploration geochemistry: Applied Publishing Ltd., May Wood, p. 614.
  •  
  • 9. Rose, A.W., Hawkes, H.E., and Webb, J.S., 1979, Geochemistry in Mineral Exploration, 3rd, Academic Press, p. 640
  •  
  • 10. Sullivan, P.J., 1988, Iron sulfide oxidation and the chemistry of acid generation. Env. Geol. Water Sci., 11, 289-295.
  •  
  • 11. Turekian, K.K. and Wedepohl, K.H., 1961, Distribution of the elements in some major units of the Earth's crust. Bull. Geol. Soc. Am., 72(2), 175-192.
  •  

This Article

  • 2013; 18(3): 93-108

    Published on Jun 30, 2013

  • 10.7857/JSGE.2013.18.3.093
  • Received on Apr 22, 2013
  • Revised on Jun 19, 2013
  • Accepted on Jun 20, 2013