• Design of Passive Treatment Systems for Mine Drainage Waters
  • Jeen, Sung-Wook;
  • Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences & The Earth and Environmental Science System Research Center, Chonbuk National University;
Abstract
Passive treatment systems are commonly used for remediation of mine drainage waters because they do not require continuous chemical inputs and operation. In this study, the selection and design criteria for such systems were evaluated, particularly the two most commonly used ones, i.e., permeable reactive barriers (PRBs) and vertical flow biological reactors (VFBRs). PRBs and VFBRs are operated on the same principles in terms of biochemical reaction mechanisms, whereas differences relate to configuration, engineering, and water management. In this study, each of these systems were described with respect to key design variables, such as metal removal mechanisms and removal rates, effectiveness and longevity, general design and construction, flow capacity, and cost. The information provided from this study could be used as a design guideline when a passive treatment option is considered for potential remediation of a mine site.

Keywords: Passive treatment system;Mine drainage water;Permeable reactive barrier;Vertical flow biological reactor;Design;

References
  • 1. Benner, S.G., Blowes, D.W., and Ptacek, C.J., 1997, A full-scale porous reactive wall for prevention of acid mine drainage, Ground Water Monit. Rem., 17(4), 99-107.
  •  
  • 2. Benner, S.G., Blowes, D.W., Gould, W.D., Herbert Jr., R.B., and Ptacek, C.J., 1999, Geochemistry of a permeable reactive barrier for metals and acid mine drainage, Environ. Sci. Technol., 33(16), 2793-2799.
  •  
  • 3. Blowes, D.W., Ptacek, C.J., Benner, S.G., McRae, C.W.T., Bennett, T.A., and Puls, R.W., 2000, Treatment of inorganic contaminants using permeable reactive barriers, J. Contam. Hydrol., 45(1-2), 123-137.
  •  
  • 4. Burton, F.L. and Tchobanoglous, G., 1991, Wastewater Engineering, McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.
  •  
  • 5. Cellan, R., Cox, A., Uhle, R., Jenevein, D., Miller, S., and Mudder, T., 1997, Design and construction of an in situ anaerobic biochemical system for passively treating residual cyanide drainage, Proceedings of the 14th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Surface Mining and Reclamation, ASSMR, Austin, TX, p. 730.
  •  
  • 6. Gibert, O., de Pablo, J., Cortina, J.L., and Ayora, C., 2005, Municipal compost-based mixture for acid mine drainage bioremediation: metal retention mechanisms, Appl. Geochem., 20(9), 1648-1657.
  •  
  • 7. Guha, S. and Bhargava, P., 2005, Removal of chromium from synthetic plating waste by zero-valent iron and sulfate-reducing bacteria, Water Environ. Res., 77(4), 411-416.
  •  
  • 8. Guo, Q. and Blowes, D.W., 2009, Biogeochemistry of two types of permeable reactive barrier, organic carbon and iron-bearing organic carbon for mine drainage treatment: Column experiments, J. Contam. Hydrol., 107(3-4), 128-139.
  •  
  • 9. Gusek, J.J. and Figueroa, L.A., 2009, Mitigation of Metal Mining Influenced Water (Vol. 2), Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, Littleton, CO.
  •  
  • 10. Hedin, R.S., Nairn, R.W., and Kleinmann, R.L.P., 1994, Passive Treatment of Coal Mine Drainage, Bureau of Mines Information Circular IC 9389, U.S, p.35.
  •  
  • 11. Hengen. T.J., Squillace, M.K., O'Sullivan, A.D., and Stone, J.J., 2014, Life cycle assessment analysis of active and passive acid mine drainage treatment technologies, Resour. Conserv. Recy., 86, 160-167.
  •  
  • 12. ITRC (Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council), 2005, Permeable Reactive Barriers: Lessons Learned/New Directions. PRB-4, The Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council.
  •  
  • 13. ITRC (Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council), 2011, Permeable Reactive Barrier: Technology Update. PRB-5, The Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council.
  •  
  • 14. Jeen, S.-W., Bain, J.G., and Blowes, D.W., 2014, Evaluation of mixtures of peat, zero-valent iron and alkalinity amendments for treatment of acid rock drainage, Appl .Geochem., 43, 66-79.
  •  
  • 15. Jeen, S.-W. and Mattson, B., 2016, Evaluation of layered and mixed passive treatment systems for acid mine drainage, Environ. Technol., 37(22), 2835-2851.
  •  
  • 16. Johnson, D.B. and Hallberg, K.B., 2005, Acid mine drainage remediation options: a review, Sci. Total Environ., 338(1-2), 3-14.
  •  
  • 17. Jung, S.P., Cheng, Y., Yim, G., Ji, S., and Kang, H., 2014, Performance and bacterial communities of successive alkalinityproducing systems (SAPSs) in passive treatment process treating mine drainages differing in acidity and metal levels, Environ Sci. Pollut. Res., 21(5), 3722-3732.
  •  
  • 18. Lindsay, M.B.J., Ptacek, C.J., Blowes, D.W., and Gould, W.D., 2008, Zero-valent iron and organic carbon mixtures for remediation of acid mine drainage: batch experiments, Appl. Geochem., 23(8), 2214-2225.
  •  
  • 19. Lovley D.R. and Goodwin, S., 1988, Hydrogen concentrations as an indicator of the predominant terminal electron-accepting reactions in aquatic sediments, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 52(12), 2993-3003.
  •  
  • 20. Ludwig, R.D., McGregor, R.G., Blowes, D.W., Benner, S.G., and Mountjoy, K., 2002, A permeable reactive barrier for treatment of heavy metals, Ground Water, 40(1), 59-66.
  •  
  • 21. Mountjoy, K.J. and Blowes, D.W., 2002, Installation of a fullscale permeable reactive barrier for the treatment of metal-contaminated groundwater, Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Compounds, Battelle Press, Monterey, CA
  •  
  • 22. Neculita, C.M., Yim, G.-J., Lee, G.Y., Ji, S.-W., Jung, J.W., Park, H.-S., and Song, H., 2011, Comparative effectiveness of mixed organic substrates to mushroom compost for treatment of mine drainage in passive bioreactors, Chemosphere, 83(1), 76-82.
  •  
  • 23. Rose, A.W., 2010, Advances in passive treatment of coal mine drainage 1998-2009, Proceedings of the 2010 National Meeting of the American Society of Mining and Reclamation, ASMR, Pittsburgh, PA, p. 847-887.
  •  
  • 24. Underwood, B.E., Kruse, N.A., and Bowman, J.R., 2014, Longterm chemical and biological improvement in an acid mine drainage-impacted watershed, Environ. Monit. Assess., 186(11), 7539-7553.
  •  
  • 25. U.S. EPA, 2000, Constructed Wetlands Treatment of Municipal Wastewaters, EPA625/R-99/010. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Cincinnati, OH.
  •  
  • 26. Walker, R. and Golder Associates Inc., 2010, Passive Selenium Bioreactor-Pilot Scale Testing: Final Report, Bureau of Reclamation Science and Technology Program, Project No. 4414, Grand Junction, CO.
  •  
  • 27. Watzlaf, G.R., Schroeder, K.T., Kleinmann, R.L.P., Kairies, C.L., and Nairn, R.W., 2004, The Passive Treatment of Coal Mine Drainage. DOE/NETL-2004/1202, U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, Pittsburgh, PA.
  •  
  • 28. Wilkin, R.T. and McNeil, M.S., 2003, Laboratory evaluation of zero-valent iron to treat water impacted by acid mine drainage, Chemosphere, 53(7), 715-725.
  •  

This Article